//**************************** Version 3 Books ***** "option40"="
A HANDBOOK
on the LEGAL PROCESSES
for the POLICE
in respect of
CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN
by
Dr. P.M. Nair
alongwith
Dr. Geeta Sekhon, Ms. Swagata Raha,
Ms. Shruthi Ramakrishnan & Ms. Sumati Thusoo
Published by
The Centre for Police Studies and Public Security,
Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai and
Bureau of Police Reserach & Development
Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi
A HANDBOOK on the LEGAL PROCESSES for the POLICE
in respect of CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN
The copyright is with Dr. P.M. Nair, Chairperson, The Centre for Police Studies and Public Security, TISS and with BPRD, Government of India
All rights reserved. However parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted for public purposes, with prior intimation to the publishers.
ISBN
Printed by Ambassador, UB-5A, Surya Kiran, New Delhi-110001 Tel.: 011-23319227
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HANDBOOK on the LEGAL PROCESSES for the POLICE
![]()
in respect of CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN
The Team & Acknowledgments xi
SECTION I 1
INTRODUCTION AND COMMON ASPECTS 1
INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT CHILDREN
Section 1.1 - Child-friendly process of investigation and care: 16
General norms
Section 1.2 - How to Assess Age of a Child Victim? 30
Section 1.3 - Communication with a Child 34
Difference between Truth and Lie
![]()
Description Page
Section 1.4 - Behaviour of a Child Victim of a Sexual Offence 43
Section 1. 5 - Children with different gender identities and sexualities 47
Section 1.6 - General Norms of a Child Friendly Trial 49
Section 1.7 - Convergence and Networking by Police with Multiple 50
Stakeholders
1.7.1. Role of the Police/SJPU vis-à-vis other authorities 51
child victims of offences: -
Criminal Justice System
SECTION II - THE SPECIFICS:DIFFERENT CONTEXTS 56
CHAPTER 1 - Sexual Offences against Children 56
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Atrocities Act)
Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPD Act)
2000 (IT Act)
Women Act, 1986
Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU)
medical care
![]()
Description Page
Cr.P.C., by the Magistrate
Chapter 1, Annexure 1: Sexual Offences and Penalties 92
Chapter 1, Annexure 2: Significant Court Rulings 95
CHAPTER 2 - TRAFFICKING OF CHILDREN 102
Commercial Sexual Exploitation
protection"
![]()
Description Page
Chapter 2, Annexure 1: List of Offences Relevant to 130
Trafficking and Penalties
Chapter 2, Annexure 2: Significant Court Rulings 133
CHAPTER 3 - CHILD LABOUR 137
Act, 1986 [CALPRA]
2015 and Model Rules
1 Chapter 3, Annexure 2: Excerpt from SOP on Investigation of Crimes of Trafficking for Forced Labour, UNODC, 2008, pp.15-16
![]()
Description Page
Chapter 3, Annexure 1:Penalties for Offences Relevant to 153 Child Labour
4.1. Steps to be taken for rescue procedure1 155
Chapter 3, Annexure 3: Significant Court Rulings 157
CHAPTER 4 - OTHER OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN 160
products and psychotropic substances 168
Chapter 4, Annexure 1: List of Other Offences and Penalties 183
Chapter 4, Annexure 2: Significant Court Rulings 194
![]()
Description Page
CHAPTER 5 -CYBER OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN 195
Sexual Offences Act, 2012
access of information)
Chapter 5, Annexure 1: Legal Framework of cyber 215
offences against children
Chapter 5, Annexure 2: Significant Court Rulings 218
CHAPTER 6 - PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE 220
Chapter 6, Annexure 1 - Table of Offences 226
under the PCM Act
SECTION III - REHABILITATION AND 226
REINTEGRATION OF THE CHILD VICTIM
Chapter 7 - Introduction to Rehabilitation of Children 226
![]()
Description Page
Chapter 7, Annexure 1: Significant Judicial Rulings 239
MkW ,- ih- ekgs'ojh] Hkk-iq-ls-
egkfuns'kd
Director General
Tel. : 91-11-26781312 (O) Fax : 91-11-26781315
E-mail : dg@bprd.nic.in
iqfyl vuqla/ku ,oe~ fodkl C;wjks
x`g ea=kky;] Hkkjr ljdkj jk"Vªh; jktekxZ&8] efgikyiqj] ubZ fnYyh&110037
Bureau of Police Reserach And Development Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India National Highway-8, Mahipal Pur,
New Delhi-110037
Child rights have tremendous significance in every aspect of the development of nations. Ensuring child rights constitute the core of good governance, and therefore is the essence of policing and the criminal justice process in our country. The Bureau of Police Research and Development (BPR&D), being dedicated to improving the quality of policing in India, has been in the fore front in espousing the best methods and enhancing professionalism in Indian Police. In this regard, I am immensely pleased to recommend this book on the law and practice with respect to child victims as a great and timely tool to the millions of investigators, supervisors and caregivers in the law enforcement and justice delivery process. It is a tool, a reference book, as well as a ready reckoner for the practitioners. It is a book that links the text to the context.
Unevenness and distortions in the justice delivery process on child rights has been a concern of all involved for quite some time now. Even a well-articulated law like POSCO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act of 2012, launched with fervour and zeal, has seen less than 10 per cent cases getting convictions (refer Crime in India of the previous years), meaning thereby that 90 per cent of the victims are not getting justice. This is a serious matter that should make all of us sit up and take notice.In this context, one of the issues that came up across the country was uneven levels of knowledge, skills and attitudinal orientation among the responders. We cannot afford to fail our children and this cannot wait anymore. Hence, I see this book, A Handbook on the Legal Processes for the Police in respect of Crimes against Children as a great instrument for a tremendous and positive impact.
The idea of the book was conceived, developed and put into process by Dr. P.M. Nair, a renowned international expert on child rights, with vast experience and expertise in law enforcement, justice delivery, professional investigation, research, legal drafting, capacity building and convergence of stakeholders. It has been drafted by him and an eminent team, working at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, with full support from Child Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF). The draft of this book, revised several times by the authors, has been duly vetted by the expert academics of the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, and the experienced officials of BPRD and has seen further improvements and value additions. The churning process has certainly enriched this book and made it more user- friendly.
I have no doubt that this book, translations of which are being planned in several Indian languages, will be a great support to the officials at the Police Stations and members of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) across India as well as all associated bodies involved in the mission of supporting child rights. Considering the tremendous value, potential and utility of this book as a tool for positive action and impact, we in BPR&D are happy to publish this book. It is a matter of great pleasure for me to dedicate this book to the children of India, with the fervent hope and belief that it will help millions of children who are subjected or vulnerable to exploitation.
![]()
(Dr. A.P. Maheshwari) Director General
New Delhi April 10, 2018
Promoting Good Practices and Standards
The Team that conceived, planned, prepared, drafted, reviewed, revised and finalized this book are as follows:
[The Handbook was conceptualised by Dr. P.M. Nair. He guided the team working on the content and also co-authored parts of Section I, Chapter 2. Dr. Geeta Sekhon, edited the Handbook and authored Section I, Introduction, 1.4 and 1.7. Ms. Swagata Raha authored Sections1.2–1.3 of Section I, Chapters 1, 2, and 3 of Section II. Ms. Shruthi Ramakrishnan authored Sections 1.1 and 1.2 of Section I, Chapters 4, 5, 6 of Section II, and Section III.]
We, in the Team,acknowledge the support of the following in drafting, review and value addition:The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), Mr. Hisham Mundol, Mr. Gopikrishna SR, Dr. Meeran Borwankar (retd. DGP), Ms. Kushi Kushalappa, Enfold Trust, Ms. Arlene Manoharan, Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore (CCL-NLSIU), Ms. Shraddha Chaudhary, CCL-NLSIU, Dr. Bincy Wilson, CCL-NLSIU, Ms. Monisha Murali, CCL-NLSIU, Ms. Sruthy Sriram, II Year, B.A.LLB. (Hons.), NALSAR, Ms. Rovina Bastian, Karnataka State Police– Gender Sensitisation Unit and many other stakeholders across the country, for their valuable advice, suggestions and ideas in improving the content and methodology in quality and presentation
We also acknowledge the eminent support of Prof. S.Parasuraman Director TISS (Tata Institute of Social Sciences), Dr. A.P. Maheshwari, IPS, the DG of BPRD as well as Ms. Sundari Nanda, IPS, Ms. Anupama Chandra, IPS, Mr. Pramod Verma, IPS, Mr. Mehmood Akhtar, IPS, Mr. Jitendra Yadav and Mr. V. Tapliyal of BPRD.
We are grateful to Ms. Rakhee Suryaprakash who donated her services as copy editor for this book, treating it as a noble cause in the process of justice delivery to children.
TATA INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Deemed to be University since 1964
Prof. PM Nair
Chairperson, Centre for Police Studies and Public Security
As the type, spread, speed and intensity of crimes against children in India are on the rise, new special legislations, along with amendments to the general and substantiate criminal laws, have come up in the recent past to effectively address the specific offences against children, with a view to ensure good governance and proper law enforcement. However, the multiplicity of laws, their uneven knowledge and, above all, lack of skilled application by the police, as well as the other stakeholders involved in the process of justice delivery and prevention, has created an alarming scenario in respect of preventing and combating crimes against children. A need was felt to collectively bring all laws dealing with crimes against children into one reference book, in a user-friendly format, along with the different child-friendly processes prescribed under each of these laws. Accordingly, the Centre for Police Studies and Public Security, a nascent unit in the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, decided to take up this project. The idea was appreciated by stakeholders from different walks of life including police, prosecutors, judiciary, academics, guardians, children, care givers, civil society partners, social workers, etc. Prompt support from Child Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) came in very handy to move ahead.
This handbook, originally titled ‘Children’s Charter’, and later changed to the present one, is focused on the rights of child victims of crime. It is essentially meant for police officials who are called upon to address the issues of child rights. It is a ready reckoner which hopes to serve as a guide book to help the user decide which law(s) are to be used, when and how to implement the provisions effectively and the skills required in its utilization and implementation. It is a process document, explaining the best methods of ensuring that the rights of child victims are protected. While this is not a compilation of laws, it is a tool which will help one gain a complete picture of the laws and the latest rulings of the superior courts in India, as well as the best practices, and help in deciding how to
invoke them in the best possible manner while dealing with offences against children.
It is a book linking the text to the context. And that is the intended purpose too, by bringing in the laws and rulings into context and helping the stakeholders ensure rule of law.
The book has been written keeping in view the requirements of the officer in charge of a police station, the investigating officers, the prosecutors, the Child Welfare Police Officer, and other stakeholders who support and facilitate investigation and related aspects as well as prevention of violence and exploitation of children. It is a tool to enhance and fine- tune the skills of the end user in the application of the laws, rules, rulings, and related provisions. It is drafted in a user-friendly manner. This book can also be of immense help to all those who work on child rights, all those who are concerned with child rights and even children who need support or help, being subjected to or vulnerable to exploitation.
It is a novel venture, hence there can be shortcomings. We also welcome suggestions for improvement.
Dr PM Nair
April 2018, Mumbai
![]()
V N Purav Marg, Sion Trombay Road, Mumbai 400 088. Website: www.tiss.edu
Tel: 022 25525200, 25525201, email: nairpm@hotmail.com, pm.nair@tiss.edu
The children of India have constitutional and legal rights for their care, protection, treatment, development, protection, rehabilitation, and re-integration. These rights are violated when children are subjected to abuse, exploitation, and violence.The police is the first responder to such a child, and plays the most crucial role in setting in motion the justice delivery system after a crime is reported or detected or when such a crime is likely to happen. The response and attitude of the police towards the child can encourage the child to participate without fear in the investigation process and later during trial, which also impacts the proper rehabilitation and reintegration of the child back into the family, and/ or society. It can also encourage more child victims and/ or their families to come forward with reports of crimes and significantly, ensure that the “process does not become the punishment” for victims.
Knowledge of child protection laws in letter and spirit is one part of the investigation work, but appropriate skills such as, those of interviewing children in a developmentally appropriate and age-sensitive manner, being alert to basic needs of children, recognizing trauma and basing decisions on where and when to interview child victims, etc., whilst dealing with child victims are equally important, and need to be actively acquired and harnessed by all Investigation Officials.
Thousands of children are being trafficked for labour or forced into various forms of commercial sexual exploitation, or are otherwise subjected to abuse, criminal neglect, and exploitation. According to the Census of 2011, about 8.2 million child labourers in the age group of 5-14 years were engaged in various occupations. NGOs however, estimate the number to be 90 million.2
A study by the Ministry of Women and Child Development3 estimates that there are about three million women in prostitution in the country, of which an estimated 40% are children, as there is a growing demand for very young girls to be inducted into prostitution. UNICEF also estimates that 1.2 million children are victims of sex trafficking in India.4 According to an ILO estimate, 15% of the country’s estimated 2.3 million persons in prostitution are children.
![]()
2 International Labour Office. 2013.
Domestic Workers across the World:
Global and Regional Statistics and the Extent of Legal Protection (Geneva). p. 14.
3 India Country Report-To Prevent and Combat Trafficking and Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children and Women, presented at World Congress III – Against Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, November 2008).
4 US Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2012. Both pictures are from UNICEF India website.

Source: UNICEF India6
With respect to child labour, child prostitution, child sexual abuse, and other crimes against children, the reported numbers are estimates, and not actual figures. The numbers of cases filed as can be gleaned from the Crime in India annual reports of the National Crime Record Bureau, also do not reflect the full extent of violence against children, as a significant number of cases are never reported and do not make it to the criminal justice system.
|
|
Data on Crimes Against Children based on Crime in India, 2016 |
|||||
|
Laws |
Cases Reported in 2016 |
Number of Victims |
Charge-sheeting rate |
Investigation Pendency Rate |
Conviction Rate |
|
|
Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 (CALPRA) |
204 |
384 |
94.6% |
63.4% |
47.1% |
|
|
Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 |
56 |
69 |
100% |
58.5% |
10.5% |
|
|
Human Trafficking (Section 370 & 370A ofIndian Penal Code) |
340 |
763 |
85.2% |
44.8% |
18.2% |
|
|
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 |
326 |
327 |
84.6% |
42.1% |
14.7% |
|
|
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 |
36022 |
36321 |
94.2% |
31.8% |
29.6% |
|
|
 Source: Crime in India, 2016; National Crime Records Bureau |
||||||
![]()
In the context of India's commitments under its Constitution and under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), India is duty bound to take measures to address violation of child rights and provide holistic support to child victims including child victims with disabilities.
The Constitution of India contains some specific and exceptional provisions referring to children (and women) and also "prohibits traffic in human beings and forced labour".
|
Article 15 |
The State can make any special provision for women and children. |
Part of Fundamental Rights; providing discretion to the government to make special laws/ policies and schemes for women and children. |
|
Article 21 A - Right to Education |
The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years. |
Part of Fundamental Rights; added to the Constitution in 2002.
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 was enacted in pursuance of Article 21 A of the Constitution. |
|
Article 23 |
Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour. |
Part of Fundamental Rights; only two Articles in the Constitution in 1950, listed as 'offences' and which, provided for 'punishment' were - trafficking and untouchability. |
|
Article 24 |
Prohibition of employment of children below the age of fourteen years in factories, etc.or any other hazardous employment. |
Part of Fundamental Rights; protecting children from performing hazardous labour. |
|
Article 39 |
The State shall, direct its policy towards securing- that the health and strength of workers, men and women, |
Article 39 is not a Fundamental Right, but is a part of the Directive Principles of State Policy - directing the State towards |
|
|
and the tender age of children are not abused and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to their age or strength. |
formulating its policies protecting children from labour. |
|
Article 39 |
State should ensure that children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and against moral and material abandonment. |
This provision is relevant to protecting children from all forms of exploitation. |
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) contains the definition of “trafficking of persons”, which was added in 2013. There are other provisions dealing with buying and selling of girls for prostitution, employing of a trafficked person, dealing in slaves, and sexual offences, etc. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) is a special law that criminalizes penetrative, touch, and non-touch based sexual offences against children and also mandates the establishment of Special Courts and procedures for trial of offences involving children.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015(JJ Act, 2015) is the core law relating to ‘children in need of care and protection’and children in conflict with the law, providing for care, protection, development, treatment, social re-integration, and rehabilitation through a child-friendly approach. It defines the term “child-friendly” to mean “any behaviour, conduct, practice, process, attitude, environment or treatment that is humane, considerate and in the best interest of the child.”7 This Act provides for setting up of institutional mechanisms to adjudicate and provide services to children in a comprehensive and holistic manner. It also specifies certain offences against children.
The Preamble of JJ Act, 2015 highlights the objectives of a ‘child-friendly’ approach and ‘best interest of the child’ principle in their care, protection, development, treatment, and social re-integration. The Principles underlined in Section 3, JJ Act, 2015, for guiding the juvenile justice system are as follows –
![]()
7 JJ Act, 2015, Section 2(15).
with law’ shall be presumed to be innocent of any mala fideor criminal intent up to the age of eighteen years.
re-victimised in the child care institutions by the staff, or by other senior children. The police should ensure the child’s safety, within this care and protection system. It would also entail ensuring their safety and protection from the accused during an on-going investigation or trial.
institutionalization of the child brought before them, the police may also remember that taking the child away from the family and placing it in an institution may not always be the best course of action.
On child labour, the two most significant laws are the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 (CALPRA), as amended in 2016. The Bonded Labour Act provides for the abolition of bonded labour system, which was historically practiced in India in several forms and continues to be practiced. The CALPRA prohibits the engagement of children in certain employments and regulates the conditions of work of adolescents in certain other employments. The CALPRA prohibits completely the employment of children below 14 years in any occupation or process (two exceptions) and prohibits the employment of adolescents (14-18 years) in any hazardous occupations or processes.
Dealing with trafficking and the organized crime of commercial sexual exploitation and prostitution of women and children is the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, along with POCSO Act,IPC, and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.
![]()
8 JJ Act, 2015, Section 74(2).
In additional to the constitutional and statutory framework, the police must also be aware of the international legal framework relating to child rights. The primary international instrument with respect to children is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child [UNCRC] adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1989. The UNCRC was acceded by India in 1992 thereby effectively agreeing to give effect to all the norms and standards contained in the provisions of the Convention. India has also ratified two additional protocols to the UNCRC dealing with the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography;9 and on children involved in armed conflict.10 Article 1, UNCRC defines child to mean “every human being below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.”
The JJ Act, 2015 and the POCSO Act, 2012 were both enacted in pursuance of India’s obligations to the UNCRC and a specific reference to this is stated in the preamble of these legislations.
The UNCRC contains four core guiding principles integral to the rights of the child, which are also reflected in Section 3, JJ Act, 2015. They are:
Article 12: Respect for the views of the child which requires States to ensure that a child capable of forming views has the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child and further that the views are given due weight in keeping with the child’s age and maturity.
![]()
9 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child
prostitution and child pornography, 2002
10 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict, 2002
|
|
JJB |
CWC |
Special Court/ Children’s Court |
Sessions Court |
Magistrate |
Family Court/ District Court |
|
Child alleged to be in conflict with the law |
16-18 years alleged to have committed a heinous offence. |
|
been transferred to the Children’s Court pursuant to the order of the JJB under section 18(3) of the JJ Act, 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
Child in need of care and protection |
|
rehabilitation, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JJB |
CWC |
Special Court/ Children’s Court |
Sessions Court |
Magistrate |
Family Court/ District Court |
|
|
|
in relation to such child. |
Section 101(1), JJ Act, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
Child victim of sexual offences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JJB |
CWC |
Special Court/ Children’s Court |
Sessions Court |
Magistrate |
Family Court/ District Court |
|
|
|
and parental support under Rule 4(3), POCSO Rules. |
|
|
|
|
|
Child victim of trafficking |
|
and placement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victim of child labour |
|
is also a child in need of care and protection, the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JJB |
CWC |
Special Court/ Children’s Court |
Sessions Court |
Magistrate |
Family Court/ District Court |
|
|
|
CWC may ask the child to be produced before it for inquiry and placement. |
|
|
offence committed by the parent or guardian of the child under section 14D of the CALPRA. |
|
|
Victim of child marriage
` |
|
and placement. |
|
|
an organisation or an association of persons probibiting such marriage.
|
orders regarding maintenance, custody of children, etc. |
Human Rights Institutions for Children
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR), with its counterparts in the States, is a statutory human rights institution set up under the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. The NCPCR and the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (SCPCRs) mandate is to ensure that all laws, policies, programmes, and administrative mechanisms are in consonance with the child rights perspective as enshrined in the Constitution of India and international Conventions ratified by India. The CPCRs are also specifically mandated to monitor the implementation of the JJ Act, 2015 and the POCSO Act, 2012, among other laws related to children.
In addition to the legal framework, the Ministry of Women and Child Development along with State Governments and Union Territories, implements the Central Government Scheme on child protection called the Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS), which provides financial and administrative support for implementation of the JJ Act, 2015.
Crimes Against Children:11 In 2016, total of 1,06,958 cases of crimes against children were reported compared to 94,172 cases during 2015, showing an increase of 13.6%.A total of 1,11,231 child victims entered the criminal justice system in 2016. The overall conviction rate for crimes against children in 2016 was 30.7% and the pendency rate was a staggering 89.6%.
In percentage terms, major crime heads under ‘Crime Against Children’ during 2016 were kidnapping & abduction (52.3%) and cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (34.4%) including child rape.
In 2016, a total of 36,321 children were victims of sexual offences of which 19,920 children i.e., 54.84% were victims of child rape under Section 376 IPC/ Section 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act and 12,329 children i.e., 33.94%were victims of sexual assaults under Sections 8 and 10, POCSO Act/Section 354 IPC.
In child labour cases, only 8 out of 385 cases were convicted. The conviction rate for cases of child trafficking under the ITPA stood at 10.5%, while the pendency rate was a staggering 95.3%.12
Under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006, 236 cases were tried with total number of 10 convictions only.
![]()
11National Crime Record Bureau, Crime in India, 2015
12 National Crime Record Bureau, Crime in India, 2016.
The conviction rate and pendency of cases for crimes against children from the Crime in India Report of 2016, is indicative of the challenges in the existing response to crimes against children.
This Handbook has been specifically drafted for law the police, particularly for investigating officers, Child Welfare Police Officers, and other police officers who interact with child victims in different capacities, keeping in view their roles and responsibilities on child protection in general and particularly under the special laws on children. The Handbook deals with ‘child in need of care and protection’ and ‘child victim’ of crime/ violence, and is not oriented towards information on ‘child in conflict with law’, which involves a different legal procedure under the JJ Act, 2015. However, it must be borne in mind that the JJ Act, 2015 recognises that child in conflict with the law can also be a child in need of care and protection and empowers the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) to transfer them to the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) so that they can be treated as children in need of care and protection. For instance, a child accused of trafficking other children could be a victim of trafficking herself. Instead of being treated as child in conflict with the law, she could be transferred by the JJB to the CWC.
The ‘USP’ of this Handbook is that it is not purely academic, and that it covers “Theory to Practice”, providing a process driven approach for implementing laws. Wherever essential, it provides step-by-step processes in flow charts, is practical to use, drafted in a user-friendly manner, and is oriented to child rights and victim-centric approach. It is a book that links the text to the context.
Although the Handbook is primarily meant for use by the police, other stakeholders, namely, prosecutors, judges, Child Welfare Committees (CWC), District Child Protection Units (DCPU) and all other child welfare institutions (governmental and non-governmental), academics, media, etc. will find it useful to understand the role and responsibilities of the police in implementing various laws that are applicable to different types of crimes against children. The stakeholder mapping and convergence presented in this Handbook, in fact will also provide guidelines to the other stakeholders on the areas of co-ordination and co-operation with the police in providing comprehensive services to child victims towards their welfare, rehabilitation and reintegration. Undoubtedly, this process-oriented book will be of immense value to all concerned with child rights including parents and guardians. Although the text is not child-friendly, it can be referred to by children under the guidance of adults to understand the role of the police vis-à-vis them.
The Handbook has three distinct sections. The first section is the introductory
part which lays out details with respect to its content, the intended beneficiaries, and the layout of the various Chapters within each Section. The first Section also contains some standalone segments of information, which are common to all types of crimes against children and relevant to child victims (such as, ‘age determination’, ‘communication with child victim-witness’, etc.). These have been collated and distinctly presented for ease of reference to avoid repetition of the same content in multiple chapters under Section II.
The second Section has several chapters based on the different types of crimes and violence against children. Although each chapter is self-sufficient in its content, relevant cross-references have been provided only to avoid too much repetition of content throughout the Handbook. Each chapter provides the context, the legal framework for that crime, the offences and the punishments, the step-by-step roles and responsibilities of the police officials at various stages, and the administrative and institutional framework such as, those provided under the JJ Act, 2015 and the Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS). Each chapter has answer to FAQs on common queries relevant to duty bearers and/ or anyone else referring the Handbook. Every chapter has annexures, containing detailed tables of the offences and punishments, and relevant court judgments for reference by police officials.The electronic version will have bookmarks in respect of themes, concepts, legal provisions, practical aspects of law enforcement etc. so that the user can have better and easy access.
Trafficking in Persons – The terms ‘Trafficking in Persons’ and ‘Human Trafficking’/‘Child Trafficking’ have been used interchangeably in this Handbook. The definition provided in Section 370, IPC13 is the reference point.
![]()
13Section 370(1), IPC states: Trafficking of persons
Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation, (a) recruits, (b) transports, ( c) harbours, (d) transfers, or
(e) receives, a person or persons, by —
Child Victim – The term ‘child victim’ is used in the Handbook to refer to a child against whom an offence/ violence has been committed.The term ‘victim’ has generated much debate in the context of sexual exploitation and violence against children; many argue that it implies powerlessness, rather than the resilience of the victim and therefore, prefer to use the term ‘survivor’ sinceit is more positive and draws attention to resistance, coping and survival. However, in the area of human rights and protection, the term ‘victim’ is used to refer to someone experiencing injustice for which the perpetrator is responsible. It indicates that the person or persons experiencing human rights violations have the right to protection, assistance and reparation.Therefore, this Handbook, which focuses on the duties of the police and responses uses the term ‘victim’ to highlight the wide-ranging rights of the child victim to an efficacious justice delivery mechanism, punishment of the offender and comprehensive protection and rehabilitation of the victim.
Recognizing the need for a dedicated police officer to deal with offences and matters concerning children, the JJ Act, 2015 requires at least one officer in every police station, not below the rank of an assistant sub-inspector, “with aptitude, appropriate training and orientation” to be designated as the Child Welfare Police Officer (CWPO).14 The mandate of the CWPO under Section 107(1), JJ Act, 2015 is to “exclusively deal with children either as victims or perpetrators, in co- ordination with the police, voluntary and non-governmental organisations.”
With a view to coordinate police functions related to children, the JJ Act, 2015 requires State Governments to constitute SJPUs in each district and city, headed by a police officer not below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or above.15 The SJPU should consist of all designated Child Welfare Police Officers and two social workers with experience of working in the field of child welfare.16 At least one social worker should be a woman.17 The SJPU also includes Railway Police dealing with children. 18 The initiative to constitute a SJPU can be taken by the Director General of Police in the State.
In border areas, it would be advisable to include representation of border security forces like the BSF, ITBP etc. as the case may be.
![]()
14 JJ Act, 2015, Section 107(1).
15 JJ Act, 2015, Section 107(2).
16 JJ Act, 2015, Section 107(2).
17 JJ Act, 2015, Section 107(2).
![]()
In districts where SJPUs are not constituted and Child Welfare Officers have not been specifically designated, it becomes incumbent on the regular police force to carry out the duties of the SJPU and CWPO to the fullest extent. The realisation of the rights of children must not be compromised in any manner for the want of specific designation of these posts. It is thus important for all police officers to be aware of their specific duties and functions in respect of children coming in contact with the legal system.
|
Supreme Court’s direction in Sampurna Behura v. Union of India, (2018) 2 SCALE 209 “It is important for the police to appreciate their role as the first responder on issues pertaining to offences allegedly committed by children as well as offences committed against children. There is therefore a need to set up meaningful Special Juvenile Police Units and appoint Child Welfare Police Officers in terms of the JJ Act at the earliest and not only on paper. In this context, it is necessary to clearly identify the duties and responsibilities of such Units and Officers and wherever necessary, guidance from the available expertise, either the National Police Academy or the Bureau of Police Research and Development or NGOs must be taken for the benefit of children.” |
The JJ Act, 2015, entrusts the care and protection of children in need of care and protection (CNCP) primarily with the CWC. Nevertheless, other stakeholders in the system are also entrusted with certain duties towards ensuring that the child receives timely and appropriate care and protection. The police, being one of the key actors coming in contact with children, are mandated to follow certain protocols with regard to children in need of care and protection.
The term “child” is defined under Section 2(12), JJ Act, 2015, to mean “a person who has not completed eighteen years of age.” A police official coming in contact with a child must prima facie ensure that the child is in fact a ‘child in need of care and protection’ as that will require them to produce such a child before the CWC. It is pertinent to take note that the duty to provide care and protection to children is an integral function of the police commensurate with other official duties. The below table lists the categories of children who are considered to be ‘children in need of care and protection’ as per the JJ Act, 2015.19
![]()
|
Children in need of care and protection |
||
|
Children living in abusive conditions
|
Children in danger of abuse
|
Children without support
|
As stated earlier, while the JJ Act, 2015 categorises children in to 'child in conflict with the law' and 'child in need of care and protection', it is pertinent to realise that this is not a strict differentiation. On many occasions, a 'child in conflict with the law' is also a 'child in need of care and protection' and requires assistance for rehabilitation and healing. For instance, children accused in drug-related offences are also victims of drug abuse. In several cases, children are used by adults to aid in commission of crimes. The police must ensure to extend care and protection to all children without discrimination irrespective of the circumstances of the case during the course of their duties.
The brief process in ensuring care and protection of children is provided below. Where a police officer is of the belief that a child is in need of care and protection
|
In re: Exploitation of Children in the State of Tamil Nadu20
In this case, the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of a newspaper article that exposed the poor state of orphanages in Mahabalipuram (Tamil Nadu) with several incidences of child sexual abuse within the institutions as well as incidences of children being used to provide sexual services to tourists. The article also exposed sexual abuse against children in educational institutions including government schools.
While assessing who a ‘child in need of care and protection’ included, the court observed that the definition in the JJ Act, 2015 excluded certain categories of children. The court in this regard opined that the definition must not be treated as an exhaustive list and be the basis of excluding certain children. In this regard the court stated:
“[W]e are of the view that since the JJ Act is intended for the benefit of children and is intended to protect and foster their rights, the definition of a child in need of care and protection must be given a broad interpretation. It would be unfortunate if certain categories of children are left out of the definition, even though they need as much care and protection as categories of children specifically enlisted in the definition. Beneficial legislations of the kind that we are dealing with demand an expansive view to be taken by the Courts and all concerned.”
Observing the above the court concluded that:
“[T]he definition of a child in need of care and protection given in Section 2(14) of the JJ Act should be given a broad and purposeful interpretation – it ought not to be treated as exhaustive but illustrative and furthering the requirements of social justice…[I]t must also include victims of sexual abuse or sexual assault or sexual harassment under the POCSO Act as also victims of child trafficking. Such children must also be given protection under the provisions of the JJ Act being victims of crime under the POCSO Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.” |
as per section 2(14) of the JJ Act, the officer has three primary obligations with regard to care and protection of children:
a. Produce the Child before a Child Welfare Committee
Any police officer or the special juvenile police unit or a designated Child Welfare Police Officer coming in contact with a child in need of care and protection
![]()
20 WP 102/2007 [Supreme Court], Decided on 5 May 2017.
must produce the child before the Child Welfare Committee within 24 hours.21 The child victim may be recovered from:
|
Production before the CWC Who can produce a child before the CWC under Section 31, JJ Act, 2015
|
Where any individual, police officer or functionary of any organization, nursing home, or maternity home finds and takes charge of a child who appears to be abandoned or lost, an orphan, or without family support, they must within 24 hours give information to the Childline Services, the nearest police station, the Child Welfare Committee, or the District Child Protection Unit, or hand over the child to a registered child care institution.22 This information is to be uploaded on a portal as specified by the Central Government or the CWC or the DCPU.23
![]()
21 JJ Act, 2015, Section 31.
22 JJ Act, 2015, Section 32(2).
23 JJ Act, 2015, Section 33.
24 JJ Act, 2015, Section 34.
Non-reporting is an offence under the Act24 and the offender is liable to be imprisoned for a period of up to six months or fine of Rs. 10,000 or both.25
Apart from the above obligations, the police are required to provide interim care and protection while having custody of the child. The JJ Act and Rules does not expressly provide for the obligations of a police officer in this regard, however, the obligations with regard to child in conflict with the law, may also be applied in case of children in need of care and protection. The relevant obligations in this regard are extracted below:26
Note must also be taken of Rule 93 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children), Model Rules, 2016 (Model Rules) which states that the State Government can take action against any officer/institution/statutory body who fails to comply with the provisions of the JJ Act, 2015 and the Rules framed thereunder.
![]()
25 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 8(3).
26 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 86(8).
27 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 8(3).
|
Child-friendly Police Stations In addition to the above mandates, the NCPCR has also issued Guidelines in respect of Child Friendly Police Stations.28 These Guidelines offer guidance in respect of setting up child-friendly police stations, procedure to be followed in respect of children in conflict with the law, and the procedure to be followed in respect of children in need of care and protection (CNCP). In respect of CNCP, the guidelines provide the following protocols to be observed:29 Behaviour and Conduct
|
![]()
28 Guidelines for Establishment of Child Friendly Police Stations: Laws Prescribing ‘Child Friendly’ Procedures, Processes, Conduct and Establishments, National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights [NCPCR], available at http://ncpcr.gov.in/showfile.php?lang=1&level= 1&&sublinkid=1307&lid=1526
29 Id. at pg 15.
|
Practice and Processes
|
|
In addition to the Cr.P.C., the procedure to be followed by the police/SJPU while handling cases relating to offences against children are dealt with in the JJ Act and Model Rules as well as the POCSO Act and Rules.
|
RECORDING OF INFORMATION |
|
|
Cognizable Cases
|
Non-Cognizable Cases
|
|
Consequence of failure of the police to record a complaint
|
|
![]()
30 Cr.P.C., Section 154.
31 Cr.P.C., Section 157(1) and Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors., AIR 2014 SC 187.
32 Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors., AIR 2014 SC 187.
33 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(3).
|
LODGING OF FIR |
|
|
INVESTIGATION |
|
|
Consequences of Summoning a Child to a Police Station |
|
Under Section 166-A(a), IPC, if a public servant “knowingly disobeys any direction of the law which prohibits him from requiring the attendance at any place of any person for the purpose of investigation into an offence or any other matter”, he can be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a minimum term of six months which can extend to two years and also be liable to fine. |
![]()
34 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(2)
35 JJ Act, 2015, Section 8(3)(l)
36 JJ Act, 2015, Section 8(3)(k)
37 JJ Act, 2015, Section 30(xvi).
38 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(4).
39 Cr.P.C., Section 160(1) proviso.
40 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 24(1).
Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors., AIR 2014 SC 187
The following directions were laid down by a Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court:
The aforesaid are only illustrations and not exhaustive of all conditions which may warrant preliminary inquiry.
not exceed fifteen days generally and in exceptional cases, by giving adequate reasons, six weeks time is provided. The fact of such delay and the causes of it must be reflected in the General Diary entry.
Territorial jurisdiction is an important factor that the police must take note of in the course of their duties particularly in respect of filing of FIR and preparing the charge-sheet.
While central laws are in general applicable throughout the territory of India, it is essential to keep in mind that several states have amendments to these laws. For instance, the state of Karnataka recently passed an amendment to the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 which renders all child marriages void an initio although the central statute only makes them voidable.41 Similarly, several states have also enacted amendments to various provisions of the Indian Penal Code. The police must ensure that they aware of these changes within the state while applying them.
In addition to State amendments to central laws, some States have also enacted separate legislations in respect of child rights. A prominent legislation in this regard is the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 [GCA] which deals with a variety of aspects in relation to child rights such as provision for education, health and nutrition; prevention of child abuse, trafficking in children, and child labour; establishment of homes for children; special protection of girl children and differently abled children; etc. The GCA is applicable only in the state of Goa.
Although in general, State laws only have applicability within the particular state, it may be made applicable to even other states through extending statutes. For instance, the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 [MCOCA] dealing with organized crime and terrorism was initially enacted for the state of Maharashtra but has been extended to states such as Delhi by the Delhi government. In some states that have not extended the MCOCA to their territory, they have passed legislation modelled after the MCOCA such as the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, 2000 and the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act, 2015.
![]()
41 Prohibition of Child Marriage (Karnataka Amendment) Act, 2016, s.2.
Further, Instead of the IPC, the state of Jammu and Kashmir has the Ranbir Penal Code, 1989 which is similar in most respects to the provisions of the IPC excepting a few differences. Similarly, the procedural aspects of criminal law has been dealt with in the Jammu and Kashmir Code of Criminal Procedure, 1989 and the Jammu and Kashmir Evidence Act, 1920. The state of Jammu and Kashmir does not have a dedicated legislation to combat child sexual abuse like the POCSO Act. The laws applicable in Jammu and Kashmir in respect of child protection have been listed below:
Territorial jurisdiction of laws is a critical aspect of a criminal case and the police must be up to date with regard to laws related to offences against children in that state and should ensure that all laws applicable to an incident are included in the charge-sheet.
Documentation and submission of relevant forms are an integral and essential function of the police. Proper and timely documentation is critical to ensure that all key authorities are intimated adequately and preventing loss of information amongst the different authorities fulfilling their role.
The different statutes prescribe a variety of forms and reports to filled and submitted by the police. They key documents required to be prepared by the police are described below:
|
Sl. No. |
Document |
|
1. |
First Information Report |
|
2. |
Home Verification Report under ITPA |
|
3. |
Record book of information received under Section 19, POCSO Act. |
|
4. |
Report of incidence of sexual offences to the CWC and Special Court under section 19(6) of the POCSO Act. |
|
5. |
Care and Protection Report to the CWC under Section 19(6) |
The role of forensics can never be under estimated. The entire spectrum of forensic chemistry, physics, biology, serology, psychology, anthropology, sociology, all come alive in the investigation and prosecution of crimes against children.
Further, the role of child psychology, to be precise forensic psychology, assumes importance in many ways. The traumatized child will not be able to communicate properly or even recall the events. The child may be confused, especially with the adult oriented questions put to the child. The child victim may be shocked so much that she/he may not be wanting to recall the events. There may be complex fear psychosis operating in the mind of the child. In an instance, where the rapist was wearing a black shirt, the child became mortally afraid of anything black, including the court room with so many black gowns. There can be several anomalies in the behaviour of thechild. Post-traumatic stress and disorder will prevent the child from even communication the problems to the care givers including doctors. Hence the police officers investigating such crimes need to acquaint oneself on the essentials of child psychology, associate professionals and experts in the entire process of investigation and prosecution. At times, it may be essential that the interview is carried out through the psycho-social expert, as if he/she is a translator coming in to translate when the victim speaks a different language. The Police officers may maintain a updated list of such professionals and request their services as and when required. Schemes like ICPS have funds to meet such expenses too. Care should be taken that the job or professionals be done by them only and cannot be accomplished by al ill trained person or even a half-baked or self-styled counsellor.
A child may have been rescued from labour or trafficking and brought before the police. A parent may walk in with a child to lodge a FIR alleging sexual abuse. A child victim of a brutal sexual assault may be found abandoned on the roadside by a patrolling police vehicle. After providing immediate comfort to the child and the person accompanying the child, the police may have to prima facie determine the age of the person, particularly to determine whether the victim is indeed a child under the JJ Act, 2015, POCSO Act, 2012, or other relevant laws.
This is crucial because certain child-friendly procedures need to be followed and legal provisions applied if the victim is a child. For instance, if the child rescued from labour appears to be above 14 years, relevant provisions pertaining to exploitation of a child employee under the JJ Act, 2015 and the CALPRA will have to be applied. If a victim of penetrative sexual assault or sexual assault is below 12 years, the offence will be aggravated under the POCSO Act and the relevant provisions will have to be mentioned in the FIR. Further, investigations should be conducted by a CWPO if the victim is a child.
It may be difficult to assess the age when the child appears to be on the borderline. Erring on the side of caution, the police may treat such a person as a child and produce him/her before the CWC or the Special Court under the POCSO
Act, as the case may be. This is because these bodies have the authority under the JJ Act, 201542 and the POCSO Act43, respectively, to determine age.

The above process can be followed by any court before which the age of a person
![]()
42 JJ Act, 2015, Section 94.
43 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 34(2).
Board(JJB)/ Court in accordance with Section 94, JJ Act.
The Supreme Court held that Rule 12 of the erstwhile Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007, which detailed the age determination process for children in conflict with the law should be applied to determine the age of a child victim. It stated:
Even though Rule 12 is strictly applicable only to determine the age of a child in conflict with law, we are of the view that the aforesaid statutory provision should be the basis for determining age, even for a child who is a victim of crime. For, in our view, there is hardly any difference in so far as the issue of minority is concerned, between a child in conflict with law, and a child who is a victim of crime.
Note: By extension, courts should apply Section 94, JJ Act, 2015 while determining the age of child victims.
The Supreme Court held:
“Age determination inquiry contemplated under the JJ Act and Rules has nothing to do with an enquiry under other legislations, like entry in service, retirement, promotion etc. There may be situations where the entry made in the matriculation or equivalent certificates, date of birth certificate from the school first attended and even the birth certificate given by a Corporation or a Municipal Authority or a Panchayat may not be correct. But Court, JJ Board or a Committee functioning under the JJ Act is not expected to conduct such a roving enquiry and to go behind those certificates to examine the correctness of those documents, kept during the normal course of business. Only in cases where those documents or certificates are found to be fabricated or manipulated, the Court, the JJ Board or the Committee need to go for medical report for age determination.”
The Supreme Court observed that in accordance with the erstwhile JJ Model
Rules, 2007 “…the medical opinion from the medical board should be sought only when the matriculation certificate or school certificate or any birth certificate issued by a corporation or by any Panchayat or municipality is not available.”
In this case, the Supreme Court held that the basis on which the entry pertaining to date of birth in a school register was recorded needs to be established for it to have evidentiary value. It held:
“To render a document admissible under Section 35, three conditions must be satisfied, firstly, entry that is relied on must be one in a public or other official book, register or record; secondly, it must be an entry stating a fact in issue or relevant fact; and thirdly, it must be made by a public servant in discharge of his official duty, or any other person in performance of a duty specially enjoined by law. An entry relating to date of birth made in the school register is relevant and admissible under Section 35 of the Act but the entry regarding the age of a person in a school register is of not much evidentiary value to prove the age of the person in the absence of the material on which the age was recorded.”
The High Court had set aside the respondent’s conviction under Section 363, 366, and 376, IPC on the ground that the prosecution had to establish the victim’s age as being below 16 years. There was a discrepancy of two days between the birth certificate and the middle school certificate produced by the prosecution and the victim was more than 15 years and less than 18 years based on the ossification test. The Supreme Court held that the discrepancy was immaterial and applied Rule 12(3)(b) of the JJ Model Rules, 2007. It was of the view that the High Court should have relied on the documents as only in their absence can a medical opinion be sought. The acquittal was set aside.
The issue before the apex court in this case was whether Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act which defines the term”child” should be interpreted to include the mental age of a person so that a mentally retarded person or extremely intellectually challenged person above the biological age of 18 years would come within its ambit. A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court held that such an interpretation would not be tenable because of the purpose of the legislation and the intention of Parliament. The court held “we would be doing violence both to the intent and
![]()
44 Decided on 21.07.2017 by the Supreme Court
the language of Parliament if we were to read the word “mental” into Section 2(1)(d) of the 2012 Act. Given the fact that it is a beneficial/ penal legislation, we as Judges can extend it only as far as Parliament intended and no further.”
The Madras High Court held that the date of birth could be proved in the absence of a birth certificate and the school certificate would be sufficient proof of date of birth.
Developing effective communication with child victims, particularly those who have suffered sexual abuse or have been trafficked, is a special skill, which needs focused attention by the police. Recognition of trauma to the child and the duty to be child-friendly along with the need to investigate should go hand in hand, to be able to get all possible information from the child in a child-friendly manner.
Careful collection of information is necessary for the care and protection of children, for identifying their families, for arresting and prosecuting offenders, and for administrating the overall process of recovery, repatriation, social- reintegration and rehabilitation.
Numerous factors make interviewing child victims-witnesses challenging. Often, information must be collected rapidly, and at a time when the child finds it difficult to provide information. The child’s ability to provide sufficient and truthful information is affected by his/her psychological and physical well-being, and issues which create mistrust, fear or silence. Consequently, the information collected is sometimes incomplete or erroneous, and sometimes, improper interviewing techniques have a negative effect on the well-being and rights of the child. ‘Interviewing’ is a learned skill and those carrying out interviews with this particularly vulnerable group of children need to acquire basic techniques of the craft to ensure that their interviewing style is child-friendly, ethical and protective.46
The below-mentioned dos and don’ts have been authored by Dr. Preeti Jacob, NIMHANS.47
![]()
45 Decided on 12.06.2015 by the Madras High Court
46 Caring for Children, Case Management and Child Friendly Interviewing, A Resource Pack; UNICEF, Regional Office for South Asia, 2008
47 Dr. Preeti Jacob, M.D. (Psychiatry), Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PDF) and D.M. (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry) and Assistant Professor, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NIMHANS. Select Extracts from: Centre for Child and the Law, Law on Child Sexual Abuse in India - Ready Reckoner for Police, Medical Personnel, Magistrates, Judges and Child Welfare Committees (November 2015) pp. 196-216.
The questioning of children for forensic purposes needs to follow a format so that the children can give accurate information to the best of their ability. Given below are some dos and don’ts for the interview procedure as well as questions that can be posed to child victims or witnesses.These have been adapted from several interview protocols.48
These would apply to interviews by the police in the course of investigation as well as examination and cross-examination during trial.
![]()
48 Including The Cornerhouse Forensic Interview Protocol (Anderson et al, 2010) , Forensic Interviewing Protocol (Governor’s Task Force on Children’s Justice and Department of Human Services, State of Michigan, 2003), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Investigative Interview Protocol (Lamb et al, 2007) and the Model Guidelines under Section 39 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012 Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India, 2013.
49 Also see, P.M.Nair, “Rights Based Investigation: The New Mantra”, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, 2017.
themselves. Their tone must be relaxed and easy-going. Sometimes children think that they have done something wrong and are in trouble and therefore are being interviewed by the judge/police personnel. It is important to allay their fears. The following is a brief example of how one can introduce one’s self at the beginning of the interview. “Namaste, my name is XYZ. I am a police/ judge in this court. Part of my work here is to talk to children about events that have happened to them.” Or, – “Hello, my name is …… and I am a police officer here. I talk to a lot of children in … (example of name of place where police station is located) about things that have happened to them. We will talk for a while and then I will take you back to the other room where your mother is waiting for you. Okay?”
|
Additional Don’ts If the child is not comfortable for any reason, try to understand the reasons and reduce/avoid them before resuming interview. If the child is not ready or willing to speak, do not force the interview. Do it at a later date when the child is willing. Avoid repeated questioning/interview on the same topic or issue unless it is essential to clarify contradiction or follow-up on important gaps. |
rather ambivalent. Sometimes it can be quite confusing for the child. The perpetrator may otherwise be pretty affectionate and caring and the child may have difficulty reconciling the different experiences shared with the perpetrator, both positive and negative experiences including the sexual abuse itself. The above statement regarding whether the child hates her/his father need not be made at all, as it is irrelevant legally to whether sexual abuse has indeed occurred or not.
must be asked. Questions such as “Did he touch you?” are not very good questions as they are unclear and misleading. Some children may answer negatively as in their experience, they were kissed not touched. Children are often literal beings and may be extra careful while answering in an interview of such nature and thus may not equate touch and kiss.
years of age. Even if they do understand the concept of reading time, they may or may not be able to relate it to events that have occurred. Children less than 4 years have difficulty with times of the day. Children less than 7 years also do not understand prepositions such as “before” and “after” clearly.It is essential to keep these facts about the developmental stages of children in mind while questioning children. Words such as ‘yesterday’, ‘day after tomorrow,’ etc., should also not be used. Clock times should not be included in questions. Instead, events should to be tied to meal times and other activities in the child’s day, (for example, to the time that he/she goes to school or comes back from school, attends singing class, etc.), which can be used as reference points. For example, – “You came back from school and then what happened?”, or “You said you ate lunch. Then what happened?”
disbelief or disgust when the child says something. If a translator is present, try and confine your communication with the translator to understanding the child. Do not engage in conversation beyond this as it could distract and prevent the free flow of thought and recall of painful memories.
too on the various aspects of child rights so that there is no violation from their side too.
In State v. Sujeet Kumar,50 the Delhi High Court was critical of the
![]()
50 CRL.A. 1190/2014 decided on 13.10.2015 by the Delhi High Court.
developmentally inappropriate questions posed by a Magistrate to assess the competence of a two-and-a-half year old child victim of a brutal rape before recording her statement under Section 164, Cr. P.C. It found the questions to the child about the school she went to and the class she studied in highly inappropriate as the child lived in a slum and did not attend any school. The Magistrate then asked her if she understood the term “truth” and the difference between truth and lie. The High Court observed: “How could a two and half year old child explain the meaning of word “truth” and state difference between truth and lie. It is very difficult, even for adults, to respond to abstract questions asking them to explain the conceptual difference between truth and lie. What to talk of a two and half year old child.”
The Delhi High Court cited an article “Child Witness Competency: When Should the Issue be Raised” and highlighted the key points as follows–
This ruling should be borne in mind by police officers who interact with children and record their statement.
|
Features of Child Sexual Abuse Extracted from: World Health Organisation, Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence, 200351 – Features that characterize child sexual abuse include:
|

![]()
51 Pg. 76 http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/ guidelines_chap7.pdf
Grooming of Child – Grooming is when someone builds an emotional connection with a child to gain their trust for the purposes of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation or trafficking.Children and young people can be groomed online or face-to-face, by a stranger or by someone they know – for example a family member, friend or professional.Many children and young people don’t understand that they have been groomed or that what has happened is abuse. The signs of grooming aren’t always obvious and the groomers will often go to great lengths not to be identified. If a child is groomed, the child may exhibit the following behaviours52 –
Grooming can affect any child, however some children may be more at risk than others such as children, who are disabled or in care, and those who are abused by known family members, such as fathers, uncles, etc. The groomers will exploit any vulnerability to increase the child or young persons dependence on them, and reduce the likelihood of the child speaking out.Police investigating cases of incest/ sexual abuse by known family member, need to understand that it is due to grooming that the child continues to say that she “loves” the father or the “grandfather”, without understanding the child was actually harmed by the abuser.It should also be noted that there is no ideal behaviour of a child victim of a sexual offences. The police should avoid arriving at conclusions about the veracity of the allegation based on the child’s emotion and physical behaviour. For instance, if the child is not distraught or upset, it cannot be interpreted to mean that the child has not been sexually abused.
Gender and sexuality are an integral component of a person’s identity including a child’s identity. While childhood by itself is denotes vulnerability, identities of gender and sexuality intensify this depending on the social landscape the child is brought up in. Development of gender and sexuality identities is also a part of the physical, cognitive, social and emotional development of a child.53 It is therefore crucial to understand these aspects and their impact while dealing with children
![]()
52 NSPCC, “Grooming: What it is, signs and how to protect children”, https://www.nspcc.org.uk/preventing-abuse/child-abuse-and-neglect/grooming/
53 Angela Oswalt, Early Childhood Gender Identity and Sexuality, Gracepoint, available at http://www.gracepointwellness.org/462-child-development-parenting-early-3-7/article/12771-early- childhood-gender-identity-and-sexuality
‘Sex’ and ‘gender’ are the commonly used terms to differentiate between male and female persons. As technical terms, ‘sex’ refers to biological difference while ‘gender’ is social difference commonly referring to ‘masculinity’ and ‘femininity’. Gender issues in children may arise biologically as well as psychologically.

Typically after the birth of a baby, the child is assigned a gender after inspection of the child’s genitals. This is both a social as well as legal process. For a majority of children, the determination of sex and gender gets resolved at birth, i.e., children assigned the male gender identify themselves as boys and later as men, and children assigned the female gender identify themselves as girls and later as women. However, some children, may begin to display gender issues as they develop. These children typically begin to non-conform with the gender they were assigned. For some of these children, it is only a temporary phase. However, a few children will persistently insist on identifying as the opposite of the gender they were assigned in addition to being gender non-conforming.54 While this group of children may grow up to become transgendered adults, they may begin the process of transitioning during their childhood itself.55 Being transgendered refers to persons who have transitioned to a different gender than the one they were assigned at birth. Transitioning can occur in several ways from just changing names and clothing, to undergoing surgery and hormone therapy.
Some gender issues are biological in nature, i.e., occur as result of chromosomal deformities. This occurs in roughly 1.7% of all children.56 These children are referred
![]()
54 Gender Non-Conforming & Transgender Children, Healthy Children, available at https:// www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/gradeschool/Pages/Gender-Non-Conforming- Transgender-Children.aspx
55 Ibid.
56 Jenny Kleeman, ‘We don’t know if your baby’s a boy or a girl’: growing up intersex, The Guardian [2 July 2016], available at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/02/male-and-female-what- is-it-like-to-be-intersex
to as ‘inter-sexed’ children. Inter-sex persons are completely different from trans- sexual persons although the two groups are mistaken as the same. While intersex is a biological condition, trans-sexual is a psychological one.
Inter-sexed children are generally assigned a gender at birth even though they display both male and female traits. These traits can be visible externally (i.e., children born with both male and female genitalia) or be only internal (i.e., chromosomal anomalies). Several parents pick a gender and opt to corrective surgery and ‘fix’ this issue. Although surgery is a popular method chosen by parents to correct this issue, many times the issue remains unresolved and children experience gender unease and dissatisfaction i.e. distress with the gender assigned to them. This occurs when the gender assigned to them does not conform with their own sense of gender identity. With children whose anomalies are not visible at birth, they become evident during the development of the child. For e.g., a child assigned the female gender, may begin to show external male traits as she grows older such as facial hair, the growth of male genitalia, etc.57
Sexual Orientation refers to the gender of the person to whom one is attracted to or wishes to be in a sexual relationship with. Sexual orientation, although commonly categorized into homosexuality (attracted to a person of the same gender) and heterosexuality (attracted to a person of a different gender), can be identified across a spectrum of orientations. Although sexuality as an identity is generally perceived to develop only post puberty, children actually develop these identities from as early as the infancy period.58
Children who display gender and sexuality issues face enormous discrimination, social stigma and humiliation in society. This directly impacts the exercise of their fundamental rights. At present, India has not legislated any special laws protecting persons who have gender and sexuality issues. Homosexuality is prohibited and is an offence under the criminal law of India.59
The Supreme Court has highlighted the rights of inter-sexed and trans-sexual persons in 2012 in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of
![]()
57 Intersex states, Encyclopedia of Children’s health, available at http://www.healthofchildren.com/ I-K/Intersex-States.html
58 Infancy Sexuality and Body Awareness Development, Gracepoint, available at https:// www.gracepointwellness.org/461-child-development-parenting-infants-0-2/article/10119-infancy- sexuality-and-body-awareness-development
59 IPC, Section 377.
India.60 In this case, the transgendered community petitioned the Supreme Court praying to recognize their right to gender identity stating that non-recognition of their gender identity is violative of the right to life and right to equality enshrined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court in its landmark decision upheld the right to have a third gender and a self-identified gender. The Court further clarified that these persons would be guaranteed all the fundamental rights available in the Constitution. The Court also asked the Centre and State governments to take steps to address the problems faced by this community.
Based on the above and the principles under Section 3, JJ Act, 2015, the police should treat inter-sex and transgender children with dignity and not discriminate against them based on their gender identity. Stigmatizing language and terms should be avoided. For instance, such children should not be referred to as “chakka”, or any other demeaning or derogatory terms.
|
Role of Police in ensuring the care and protection of inter-sex children, transgender children or children with different sexualities While there is no law that guides the police in their interaction with transgendered, intersexed children, and children with different sexualities, the guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW)is instructive.61 Although the guidelines are issued primarily for medico-legal care of survivors and victims of sexual assault, they provide useful guidance for all persons dealing with such children entering the Juvenile Justice system or the criminal justice system.The guidelines which are relevant even for law enforcement officials to observe have been extracted below:Relevant Guidelines for transgender and intersex children from the MOHFW Guidelines :62
|
![]()
60 National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438
61 Guidelines & Protocols, Medico-legal care for survivors/victims of sexual violence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare [2014] available at https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/ 953522324.pdf
62 Id. at p.12
Guidelines for dealing with children with alternate sexualities:63
|
|
Norms of a Child-friendly Trial64 |
|
![]()
63 Id. at p.13
64 JJ Rules, 2016, Rule 54(18),
|
child, the decision to take the child out of the custody of a parent, guardian, or childcare institution can be taken only by the Child Welfare Committee.65 Courts before whom such children are produced should direct the police to present the child before the jurisdictional CWC.
|
During the entire process, from the filing of the complaint, during investigation, prosecution and trial and the care, protection, rehabilitation and reintegration of the child victim, various functionaries are involved at different stages. Some of these stakeholders, such as, the police, the nodal government departments and the non-governmental stakeholders – have corresponding roles and responsibilities, which are all geared towards providing a victim-friendly and child-friendly treatment to the child victim at all stages of the justice delivery and beyond.
While it is important that each of the stakeholders perform their role well, effective delivery of child protection services requires coordination and convergence amongst them.
![]()
65 POCSO Rules, Rule 4(3) (4)
|
Sr. No. |
Police/SJPU |
Convergence and Networking Relation |
|
1 |
Role of the Police/SJPU vis-à-vis Child Welfare Committee (CWC) |
|
|
2 |
Role of the Police/SJPU vis-a-vis NGOs |
|
![]()
66 JJ Act, 2015, Section 106.
|
Sr. No. |
Police/SJPU |
Convergence and Networking Relation |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Role of Police/SJPU vis-à-vis Department of Health (hospital) |
|
|
4 |
Police/SJPU – Department of Labour Coordination |
|
|
5 |
Role of the Police/SJPU vis-a-vis State/District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) [Details of SLSAs is available at https:// nalsa.gov.in/state-lsas- websites] |
|
|
6 |
Role of Police/SJPU vis-à-vis Special Public Prosecutors and Prosecutors |
|
|
Sr. No. |
Police/SJPU |
Convergence and Networking Relation |
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Role of the Police/SJPU vis-à-vis DCPU. |
Cooperate in cases of offences within child care institutions.
|
|
8. |
Role of the Police/SJPU vis-à-vis Media |
|
![]()
67 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 86(12).
|
Stages of Intervention |
Relevant Stakeholders |
|
Identifying victims
Rescue of victims Post-rescue interview
Referral Services
Investigation of cases Prosecution of cases
Rehabilitation and Social Re-integration
Repatriation |
Police,Department of Labour, Department of Immigration, Border Security Forces, NGOs/ Childline, complaints by victim/ parents/ public spirited citizen / doctor, nurse, DCPU. Police,Department of Labour, Department of Immigration, Childline, NGOs (aiding and assisting the rescue team). Police,CWC,Department of Labour, Department of Immigration, NGOs/SJPU social worker/DCPU Social Worker/Case Worker, counsellor. Police/SJPU, Prosecutor’s office, CWC, Department of Labour, Department of Immigration, NGOs/social worker / counsellor, Department of Health, District Legal Services Authority, Support Person, DCPU. Police/SJPU, Police with Department of Labour (for forced/ bonded/ child labour) Directorate of Prosecution, public prosecutors along with the Investigating officer from Police, Department of Labour, victim’s lawyer. Police, prosecutors, courts, JJB, CWC, DCPU, NGOs, Support Person, DLSA/SLSA, Department of Labour, Department of Health, Department of Education, Skill India Initiative, Ministry of External Affairs (for repatriation of foreign child victims). Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of External Affairs, police, prosecutors, courts, authorities under the JJ Act, 2015, NGOs. |
Duties of the State Government and other governmental agencies with respect to trying offences against
|
Duties of the State Government |
|
|
Infrastructural |
|
![]()
68 JJ Act, 2015, Section 106.
69 POCSO Act, Section 28(1).
|
Duties of the State Government |
|
|
Legal Aid
|
|
|
Duties of the Magistrate recording the statement of the child victim under section 164 |
|
|
|
![]()
70 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Section 12.
71 JJ Rules, 2016, Rule 54(16)
72 Rule 54(12)
73 Rule 54(17)
74 Rule 54(14)
|
P.C in the children's room, or if possible at the residence of the child. The residence can include the home or an institution where the child resides.75
|
|
|
Duties of the Judge |
|
|
Trial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testimony of the Child |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
![]()
75 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(13)(i). 76 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(13)(ii). 77 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(13)(iii). 78 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(12).
79 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(12).
80 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(15).
81 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 54(14) .
82 Ministry of Women and Child Development, Study on Child Abuse: India 2007, p.74 http://www.childlineindia.org.in/pdf/MWCD-Child-Abuse-Report.pdf
83 Ibid.
Sexual offences against children, however, remain largely underreported and hidden. Data based on the National Crime Records Bureau’s Crime in India, 2016 reveals:84
|
Total number of cases registered under POCSO Act |
36022 |
|
Total number of cases under Section 376, IPC and Section 4 & 6, POCSO Act |
19765 |
|
Total number of cases of sexual assault under Section 8 & 10, POCSO Act and Section 354, IPC |
12,226 |
|
Total number of cases of sexual harassment |
934 |
|
Total number of cases in which charge-sheet was submitted |
30,891 |
|
Cases Pending Investigation |
15,283 (31.8%) |
Reporting of cases under the POCSO Act has significantly increased from the previous years. It was 14,913 cases in 2015 and 8904 cases in 2014. The increase could be attributed to greater awareness among the public as well as the police about the POCSO Act.
Studies have shown that contrary to the popular belief that the threat of sexual abuse is posed mostly by strangers, most perpetrators of sexual offences against children are known to the children.85 This is also borne out by the data collected by the National Crime Records Bureau, which revealed that in 94.6% cases of rape and rape read with penetrative and aggravated penetrative sexual assault against children in 2016, the offender wasknown to the victim.86 Neighbours, followed by persons who promised to marry the victim were two distinct categories of known persons, apart from relatives, and close family members signifying
![]()
84 Table 4A.3, Police Disposal of Crime Against Children Cases (Crime Head-wise) – 2016, Crime
in India, 2016; Table 6.2, Cases Reported (I), No. of Victims (V) and Rate(R) of Crimes Committed Against Children During 2015, National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2015; Table 6.2, Incidence (I), No. of Victims (V) and Rate(R) of Crimes Committed Against Children During 2014, National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2014.
85 Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore (CCL-NLSIU), Report of Study on the working of Special Courts under the POCSO Act, 2012 in Delhi, 29 January 2016, pp. 62-64, https://www.nls.ac.in/ccl/jjdocuments/specialcourtPOSCOAct2012.pdf – Of the 667 cases decided by Special Courts in Delhi, 80% of the accused were known to the victim, 17% were strangers, and the profile of the remaining 3% was not specified. CCL-NLSIU, “Study on the Working of Special Courts under the POCSO Act, 2012 in Assam”, 13 February 2017, pp. 56-57, https://www.nls.ac.in/ccl/jjdocuments/studyspecialcourtassamPOSCOAct2012.pdf – Of the 172 cases decided by Special Courts in Assam, 78% of the accused were known to the victim, 10% were strangers, and the profile was unspecified in 12% cases.
86 Table 3A.4, Offenders Relation to Victims of Rape – 2016., National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2016.
children’s vulnerability within the community and at home.87 12.09% of offenders known to the victim were close family members and relatives, including grandfathers, fathers, brothers, live-in-partners etc., thus indicating that sexual abuse of children takes place within the family setting as well.
The police should bear in mind that children with disabilities are more susceptible to sexual abuse. A 2012 review on the prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities published in Lancet, a renowned medical journal, and endorsed by the World Health Organisation revealed that children with disabilities are “2.9 times more likely to be victims of sexual violence”. Further, children with mental or intellectual disabilities are more vulnerable as they face “4.6 times the risk of sexual violence than their non-disabled peers.”88
Sexual offences against children are recognized under the following statutes:
Additionally, provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) and Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA) are relevant to the procedures and evidentiary rules to be followed by Special Courts while trying sexual offences against children.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act, 2015) will apply when the accused is a person below the age of 18 years, and/or when the child victim is also found to be in need of the State’s care and protection. A child who has been, is being, or is likely to be abused, tortured or exploited for
![]()
87 Table 3A.4, Offenders Relation to Victims of Rape – 2016, National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2016.
88 Jones, Bellis, etal., “Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies”, The Lancet, Volume 380, No. 9845, p 899- 907, 12 July 2012, referred to in http://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/ violence_children_lancet.pdf?ua=1
sexual abuse or illegal acts comes under the ambit of a child in need of care and protection under the JJ Act, 2015.89 Further, a child who has been or is likely to be subjected to a sexual offence under the POCSO Act by a person living in the same or shared household with the child, of if the child is living in a child care institution and is without parental support, or if the child does not have a home or parental support, such a child has to mandatorily be produced before the Child Welfare Committee by the police or SJPU.90
The provisions of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 will have to be applied if the child victim under the POCSO Act is married. If the child victim is pregnant and wishes to terminate the pregnancy, the procedures under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 will have to be followed to facilitate such termination.
The POCSO Act, a special legislation enacted to protect children from sexual assault, sexual harassment and pornography, recognizes penetrative, touch and non-touch based sexual offences. Provisions of the POCSO Act are gender-neutral vis-à-vis both the perpetrator and the victim.
|
Penetrative Sexual Offences under the POCSO Act |
|
|
Touch-based Sexual Offences under the POCSO Act |
|
![]()
89 JJ Act, 2015, Section 2(14)(viii).
90 POCSO Rules, Rule 4(3).
|
Non-touch based Sexual Offences under the POCSO Act |
|
|
Other Offences under the POCSO Act |
|
The POCSO Act has expanded the concept of penetration to include penetration to any extent, of not just the vagina, but also the penetration of the anus, urethra, and mouth by the penis of a person.91 Insertion of objects or body parts, other than the penis, into the vagina, urethra, or anus of the child or making the child do so with the perpetrator or any other person also constitutes
penetrative sexual assault under Section 3(b). Manipulation of the child’s body parts to cause penetration into the vagina, urethra, anus or any other body part of the child is also an offence.92 Penetrative sexual assault also includes within its ambit the application of mouth to the penis, vagina, and urethra of the child.93 Making the child penetrate any person or the perpetrator in any of the above- mentioned ways is also an offence.
![]()
91 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 3(a).
92 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 3(c).
93 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 3(d).
Aggravating FactorsThe POCSO Act recognizes aggravating factors that warrant the imposition of a higher penalty under Section 5. They are as follows:
![]()
94 POCSO Act, 2012, Section 21.
|
Sexual Offences within the Family Setting The POCSO Act, 2012 recognizes that sexual offences can be perpetrated by relatives and family members too and considers it to be an aggravated ground for penetrative sexual assault as well as sexual assault. Penetrative sexual assault or sexual assault by a person related to the child by marriage is an aggravating factor. Rape by a relative or a person in a position of trust or authority constitutes aggravated rape under the IPC.Besides, in Independent Thought v. Union of India95, to ensure harmony between the POCSO Act and the IPC and to social justice to the married girl child, the Supreme Court read down Exception 2 under Section 375, IPC as “Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape.” It is also important to note that a child may experience confusion and guilt along with trauma when the perpetrator is a family member. Allegations of sexual abuse should not be dismissed as frivolous or false merely because the child says she loves or is fond of the alleged perpetrator. Care should be taken during questioning a child to also assess whether the child has been groomed by the perpetrator. |
The presence of sexual intent is a necessary ingredient of the offences of sexual assault (Section 7), aggravated sexual assault (Section 9) and sexual harassment (Section 11). Sexual assault includes touching of the vagina, penis, anus or breast of the child or doing any other act with sexual content which involves non- penetrative physical contact. For instance, kissing a child or touching a child’s genitals during bathing or medical examination with a sexual intent would constitute sexual assault. Making the child touch any of the above-mentioned body parts of any person or the perpetrator is also a sexual assault. The grounds for aggravated sexual assault are the same as those for aggravated sexual assault, except the ground related to pregnancy, as that is not applicable in case of sexual assault, a non-penetrative offence.
![]()
95 Writ Petition (Civil) No. 382 of 2013 decided on 11.10.17.
Sexual harassment entails utterance of any word or making of any sound or gestures or exhibition of any body part or object with a sexual intent and intention that this is seen or heard by the child.96 Showing the child media or objects for pornographic purposes, stalking a child physically, electronically or digitally, or threatening to use in any form of media body parts of the child or the child’s involvement in a sexual act, real or fabricated, constitute sexual harassment.97 Enticement of a child for pornographic purposes also falls within the ambit of sexual harassment.98
Using a child through any media for preparing, producing, offering, transmitting, publishing, facilitating and distributing pornographic material for sexual gratification is a punishable offence. This includes representation of child’s sexual organs, using children engaged in real or simulated sexual acts, with or without penetration, and indecent or obscene representation of children.99 It is immaterial whether the media is for personal use or distribution.100 The POCSO Act also criminalizes the use of a child for pornographic purposes and commission of penetrative/aggravated penetrative sexual assault and sexual/aggravated sexual assault by directly participating in pornographic acts. Storage for commercial purposes of pornographic materials involving a child is a punishable offence.101
The POCSO Act provides for two presumptions – presumption as to certain offences (Section 29) and presumption of culpable mental state (Section 30). A person prosecuted for committing, abetting or attempting to commit penetrative sexual assault, aggravated penetrative sexual assault, sexual assault, or aggravated sexual assault will be presumed to have committed the offence unless the contrary is proved. If an offence requires presence of a culpable mental state, the Special Court should presume its existence and the burden is on the defence to establish that the accused did not have the mental state. The phrase “culpable mental state” includes “intention, motive, knowledge of a fact and the belief in, or reason to believe, a fact.”102 The offences of sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, and sexual harassment require the presence of sexual intent. The presumption of culpable mental state can be applied to these offences.
![]()
96 POCSO Act, Section 11(i)(ii).
97 POCSO Act, Section 11(iii)(iv)(v).
98 POCSO Act, Section 11(vi).
99 POCSO Act, Section 13.
100 POCSO Act, Section 13.
101 POCSO Act, Section 15.
102 POCSO Act, Section 30 Explanation.
|
Delhi Witness Protection Scheme, 2015103
The Delhi government has notified a Witness Protection Scheme, which empowers the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to pass directions for protection of witnesses, protection of identity, change of identity, or relocation of a witness. An application for protection can be moved by the witness, a family member, a lawyer, or the concerned IO/SHO and preferably forwarded through the Prosecutor.104 The Scheme provides a wide range of protections such as ensuring that the witness is not exposed to the accused during investigation or trial, changing the telephone number of the witness, installation of security devices in the home of the witness, concealment of identity of the witness, patrolling, escort to and from the court, in-camera trials, allowing a support person to be present during deposition and statements, use of specially designed vulnerable witness courtrooms, expeditious recording of depositions, and financial grants for relocation, sustenance, etc.105 |
|
Karnataka State Child Protection Policy, 2016 (KSCPP) The KSCPP applies to all educational institutions (EI) that have been defined to mean and include “an institution by whatever name called, including pre-primary, primary, middle, secondary, higher secondary schools, apprenticeship training centres, corporate skill training centres, and includes all premises attached thereto which is carrying on either, exclusively or among other activities the activity of imparting education for children between the ages of 2.5 to 18 years.”106 It also applies to tutorials, government schools, private schools, partly or wholly aided schools, aided and unaided minority schools. Every EI is required to have a written Child Protection Policy that should recognize protection of children and their commitment to provide a protective environment.107 Among several obligations, the KSCPP requires EIs to constitute a Child Protection Committee to focus on complaints and violations.108 The internal response reporting and redressal process is detailed in the KSCPP that includes informing appropriate authorities, ensuring the safety of the child victim, undertaking immediate risk assessment of the child, ensuring medical intervention, informing parents/guardians, preserving evidence, reporting to the police and cooperating with investigation, convening internal meeting, ensuring confidentiality, completing inquiry and taking action and following up on it.109 |
![]()
103 Available at http://dslsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/273286063-Delhi-Witness-Protection- Scheme-2015.pdf
104 Delhi Witness Protection Scheme, 2015, Clause 2(n).
105 Id at Clause 7.
106 Operational Guidelines and Procedures for Educational Institutions under Karnataka State Child Protection Policy, 2016, Para 2.1, p.21.
107 Id at Para 3.1, p.23.
108 Id at Para 4.2.1, p.31.
109 Id at Para 4.3, pp.35-39.
Pursuant to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 some sexual offences in the IPC were redefined, while several others were introduced. It is important to note that unlike the POCSO Act, most sexual offences under the IPC are not gender neutral. Rape, for instance, can be perpetrated only by a man against a woman.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Independent Thought v. Union of India, sexual intercourse or sexual acts of a man with his wife who is not below the age of 18 years, will not constitute rape.110 In other words, sexual intercourse of a husband with his wife below the age of 18 years will constitute statutory rape under the IPC.
|
Note: No sanction for prosecution is required to prosecute a public servant charged with sexual offences under the IPC. |
Sexual offences relevant to children under the IPC are111:
![]()
110 IPC, Section 375, Exception 2.
111 Source: Raha, Giliyal, Sajjanashetty & Ramakrishnan,
Frequently Asked Questions on the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore, (revised 2nd ed. 2016) pp. 33-34.
The following grounds constitute aggravated rape under the IPC:
Under the Atrocities Act, the intentional touching of a woman belonging to SC or ST by a person having knowledge about her identity is an offence when the touch
![]()
112 IPC, Section 376(2)(i).
113 IPC, Section 376(2)(l).
114 IPC, Section 376(2)(f).
115 IPC, Section 376(2)(d).
116 IPC, Section 376(2)(e).
117 IPC, Section 376(2)(k).
118 IPC, Section 376(2)(a).
119 IPC, Section 376(2)(b).
120 IPC, Section 376(2)(c).
121 IPC, Section 376(2)(g).
122 IPC, Section 376(2)(h).
123 IPC, Section 376(2)(m).
124 IPC, Section 376(2)(n).
is of a sexual nature and without the woman’s consent.125 The term “woman” signifies a “female human being of any age” and would therefore include girls below the age of 18 years.126 Using words, acts, or gestures of a sexual nature towards a woman belonging to SC or ST having knowledge about her identity is also an offence.127 These sexual offences under the Atrocities Act are not gender neutral in nature and are only applicable as against female victims. Both these offences are punishable with a minimum term of six months imprisonment that can extend to five years and fine.128 In cases under these provisions, the prosecution will have to establish that the accused was not a member of SC or ST, the accused had
knowledge that the victim belonged to a SC or a ST, and that the nature of the touch was sexual in nature.
The term “consent” has been defined to mean “an unequivocal agreement when the person by words, gestures, or any form of non-verbal communication, communicates willingness to participate in the specific act”.129 It has been clarified that the absence of physical resistance to an act of a sexual nature cannot by itself be construed as consent for the sexual activity.131 Further, the woman’s sexual history, including with the offence will not imply consent or mitigate the offence.131
![]()
125 Atrocities Act, Section 3(1)(w)(i).
126 IPC, Section 10 read with Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1988 as amended in 2015, Section 2(1)(f).
127 Atrocities Act, Section 3(1).
128 Atrocities Act, Section 92.
129 Atrocities Act, Explanation to Section 3(1)(w).
130 Atrocities Act, first proviso to Section 3(1)(w).
131 Atrocities Act, second proviso to Section 3(1)(w).
132 SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995, Rule 7(1).
133 SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Rules, 2016, Rule 4 which has substituted Rule 7(2) with the above-described provision.
134 Ibid.
135 SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Rules, 2016, Rule 4 which has introduced Rule 7(2A).
136 Atrocities Act, Section 4 as amended by the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.
137 Ibid, Sections 4(2) proviso and 4(3).
Under the RPD Act, assaulting or using force with the intention of outraging the modesty of a woman with disability is an offence.139 Sexual exploitation of a child with disability by a person in a position to dominate the will of the child is also an offence.140 Both these offences are punishable with a minimum term of six months imprisonment that can extend to five years and fine.141
The RPD Act also requires the government to enable persons with disabilities to “access any court, tribunal, authority, commission or any other body having judicial or quasi-judicial or investigation powers without discrimination on the basis of disability.”142 This would imply that the physical environment and communications within Special Courts under the POCSO Act, court complexes, police stations, as well as Commissions for Protection of Child Rights, CWCs, JJBs, etc., are accessible to all children with disabilities.
Section 7(4), RPD Act obligates a police officer who receives a complaint or comes to know about abuse, violence or exploitation toward a person with disability to inform such a person about the right to apply to an Executive Magistrate for protection, details of the jurisdictional Executive Magistrate, details of the nearest organization or institution working for persons with disabilities, right to free legal aid, and the right to file a complaint under the RPD Act or any other law dealing with such an offence.These duties are in addition to the duty of the police officer to follow the procedures if the information relates to the commission of a cognizable offence.143
Section 67B, IT Act criminalizes the publication or transmission of material depicting children i.e., persons who have not completed 18 years of age, in a sexually explicit act in an electronic form.144 The provision also criminalizes:
![]()
139 RPD Act, Section 92(b). 140 RPD Act, Section 92(d). 141 RPD Act, Section 92.
142 RPD Act, Section 12(1).
143 RPD Act, Section 7(4) proviso.
144 IT Act, Section 67B(a).
For more information on cyber offences against children refer to Chapter 5.
The publication of advertisements, production, sale, distribution, circulation or sending by post anything depicting a woman – her figure, form, body, or any part
Publications proven to be for the public good on the ground that they are in the interest of science, literature, art or learning or objects of general concern or publications kept or used for bona fide for religious purposes are exempted. Representations in ancient monuments, temples, cars used for conveyance of idols or used for religious purposes, and films to which Part II of the Cinematography Act, 1952 applies are also exempt.
The Goa Children’s Act, 2003 defines sexual offences to include grave sexual assault, sexual assault, and incest.145 It is gender neutral qua the victim and the accused, The term sexual assault includes touch and non-touch based sexual acts such as146:
![]()
145 Goa Children’s Act, 2003, Section 2(y).
146 Goa Children’s Act, 2003, Section 2(y)(ii).
Grave sexual assault includes penetrative as well as non-penetrative sexual acts such as147:
Incest has been defined to mean “commission of a sexual offence by an adult on a child who is a relative or is related by ties of adoption.”148 Note that the term incest does not appear in any of the legislations mentioned above.
The POCSO Act and Rules stipulate the procedures that should be followed by the police and SJPU in a case of sexual offence against a child. Procedures have also been prescribed under the Cr. P.C in respect of sexual offences against women. Failure to record the commission of a sexual offence under the POCSO Act is an offence punishable with imprisonment of either description that can extend to six months or fine or both.149 Failure to record sexual offences under the IPC is punishable with a fine and rigorous imprisonment for a minimum of six months, which can extend to two years.150 If a police officer knowingly disobeys the direction of law, which prohibits her or him from requiring the attendance at any place of any person for investigation, she or he can be punished with fine and rigorous imprisonment for a minimum of six months which can extend to two years.151 For instance, if a police officer summons a child to the police station for recording a statement in the night time, he can be held liable for doing so in contravention of Sections 24(1) and 24(4) of the POCSO Act.
![]()
147 Goa Children’s Act, 2003, Section 2(y)(i). 148 Goa Children’s Act, 2003, Section 2(y)(iii). 149 POCSO Act, Section 21(1).
150 IPC, Section 166-A(c).
151 IPC, Section 166-A(a).
The chart below depicts the steps that should be taken by the police/SJPU under the POCSO Act and Rules as well as the Cr. P.C. They are not necessarily sequential as in some cases the police may have to facilitate emergency medical care or care and protection before recording the FIR.
|
Recording of Information |
|
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
|
![]()
152 NCPCR, Monitoring Guidelines for NCPCR/SCPCR for Roles and Functions of Various Stakeholders: Police, Special Courts and Special Prosecutors, prepared by Lawyers Collective (LCWRI) and UNICEF, p.24.
153 Delhi Police, Standing Order No. 303 of 2009 – Guidelines to be followed by the police while investigating cases of rape, p.4.
Don’ts
|
![]()
154 NCPCR, Monitoring Guidelines for NCPCR/SCPCR for Roles and Functions of Various Stakeholders: Police, Special Courts and Special Prosecutors, prepared by Lawyers Collective (LCWRI) and UNICEF, p.29.
155 Id at p.24.
156 Id at p.25.
|
|
Sending Report to the CWC and Special Court |
|
|
Dos and Don’ts |
|
Dos
Don’ts
|
|
Ensure Immediate Care and Protection |
|
|
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
Don’ts
|
|
Facilitate Medical Examination and Emergency Medical Care |
v. Shivanna, (2014) 8 SCC 913] |
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
|
Don’ts
|
|
Record Child’s Statement |
|
![]()
157 Id at p.32.
|
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
Don’ts
|
![]()
158 UNODC, Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) On Investigating Crimes of Trafficking for Commercial Sexual Exploitation, (2007), p.31
|
|
Facilitate Recording of 164 Statement by Magistrate |
v. Shivanna, (2014) 8 SCC 913] |
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
Don’ts
|
|
|
Keep Victim and Family Informed and Provide Information about Legal Aid |
|
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
|
![]()
159 Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India, (1995) 1 SCC 14.
Don’ts
|
|
Conduct Investigation and File Charge-sheet |
|
|
Dos & Don’ts |
|
Dos
|
![]()
160 POCSO Rules, Rule 4(2)(d).
161 Cr.P.C., Section 172(1), (1-A), (2).
162 Cr.P.C., Section 173(1-A).
163 IT Act, Section 78
|
![]()
164 Crl. A. 513/1998, decided on – 30.05.2014.
Based on the POCSO Act, IPC, Cr. P.C, and the Guidelines and Protocols for Medico-legal care for Victims and Survivors of sexual violence issued Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Guidelines:
during separation, sexual intercourse by a person in authority, gang rape, or rape by a repeat offender.165 Further, they should inform the police immediately about the incident.166
![]()
165 Cr.P.C., Section 357-C.
166 Ibid
167 Cr.P.C., Section 164-A(1). 168 MOHFW Guidelines, p.24. 169 Id at p.39.
170 Cr.P.C., Section 164-A(4). 171 POCSO Act, Section 27(2). 171 MOHFW Guidelines, p.20. 172 Ibid
![]()
173 POCSO Act, Section 27(3) and POCSO Rules, Rule 5(2)
174 POCSO Act, Section 27(4).
175 Cr.P.C., Section 164-A(2)(3)(5).
176 POCSO Rules, Rule 5(2).
177 POCSO Act, Section 27(1) and POCSO Rules, Rule 5(3).
178 POCSO Rule, Rule 5(4).
179 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Guidelines, p.34.
The Product of Conception (PoC) should be collected, packed, labelled, sealed in the presence of police officer and handed over to police to send to FSL for DNA matching with accused. It should be transported by the police in an ice-box with temperature around 4 degree Celsius (2-8 degree Celsius) at all times.180
![]()
180 Madan Gopal Kakkad v. Naval Dubey, (1992) 3 SCC 204 endorsed Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology (21st ed).
181 CEHAT Manual, p.15
182 Madan Gopal Kakkad v. Naval Dubey, (1992) 3 SCC 204.
183 CEHAT Manual, p.15.
184 Lillu v. State of Haryana, AIR 2013 SC 1784; MOHFW Guidelines, p.60.
185 Ibid
privacy, physical and mental integrity available under Article 21, Constitution of India and have no bearing on a case of sexual violence.186
The POCSO Act does not mandate that a statement under Section 164, Cr.P.C. be recorded in every case. However, pursuant to the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, Section 164(5-A)(a), the statement of victim against whom offences has been committed under Sections 354, 354-A, 354-B, 354-C, 354-D, 376(1), 376(2), 376-A, 376-B, 376-C, 376-D, 376-E or 509 of the IPC has to be recorded by a Judicial Magistrate. The statement should be recorded as soon as the commission is brought to the notice of the police.187 In cases of rape, the IO should take the victim within 24 hours to any Metropolitan/preferably Judicial Magistrate for recording the 164 statement and preferably to a Lady Magistrate.188
![]()
186 Cr.P.C., Section 164(5-A)(a).
187 State of Karnataka v. Shivanna, (2014) 8 SCC 913.
188 Ibid
189 Ibid.
190 Ibid.
191 POCSO Act, Section 28(1).
Under the POCSO Act, the State Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, should designate a Sessions Court to be a Special Court in every district to try offences under the Act.192 The Special Court can try offences under the POCSO Act and offences with which the accused is charged under the Cr.P.C. at the same trial.193
The Special Court designated under the POCSO Act will have the jurisdiction to try offences in addition to those under the POCSO Act with which the accused has been charged under the Cr. P.C at the same trial.194 Where the accused has been charged under the Atrocities Act along with the POCSO Act, the matter will be tried by the Special Court under the POCSO Act and not the Special Court under the Atrocities Act.195
It will also have the jurisdiction to try offences relating to publication or transmission of sexually explicit material depicting children in any act or conduct or manner that facilitates abuse of children online under Section 67B, Information Technology Act, 2000.196
The police should thus submit the charge-sheet to the Special Court under the POCSO Act.
![]()
192 POCSO Act, Section 28(2).
193 Ibid.
194 In Re: A Ref u/s 395(2) Cr.P.C by S.J. v. Unknown, S.B. Criminal Reference Petition No. 1/ 2013, Rajasthan High Court-Jodhpur Bench; Reference Case No.1 of 2017, In the matter of reference under Section 395 of Cr.P.C. made by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahilar Court, Tiruchirappalli, in his letter in D.No.238/2016 dated 17.03.2017 decided on 28.04.2017 by the Madras High Court. 195 POCSO Act, Section 28(3).
196 POCSO Rules, Rule 7(2)
have to be communicated to the Special Court, who should put the questions to the child.(Section 33(2), POCSO Act)
![]()
197 POCSO Rules, Rule 7(4) and 7(5)
198 POCSO Rules, Rule 7(3)
199 POCSO Act, Section 34(1); JJ Act, 2015, Section 1(4)(i).
All relevant provisions should be mentioned in the charge-sheet. This is because the ingredients and penalties may be different under different laws. For instance, rape of a 15-year-old girl would constitute aggravated rape under the IPC and penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act. Aggravated rape under the IPC would attract higher penalty than that of penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act. Further, an alleged act may constitute distinct offences under different laws. For instance, the accused may have filmed the abuse or shown the child pornography and then abused the child. In such cases, relevant provisions under the POCSO Act, IPC, and the IT Act should be applied as the act constitutes distinct offences under each of these laws.
No, a person below 18 years who allegedly commits a sexual offence against a child will be dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.200 Such a person should be produced before the JJB after apprehension by the police or the SJPU.
A person above 16 years and below 18 years alleged to have committed penetrative or aggravated penetrative sexual offences can be treated as an adult if they are transferred to the Children’s Court by the Juvenile Justice Board and the Children’s Court decides to try the child as an adult. However, the child must first be produced before the JJB who will make the above assessment in accordance with the JJ Act.
According to Section 82, IPC “nothing is an offence which is done by a child under seven years of age.” Although an FIR will have to be lodged if the offence alleged is cognizable, no penal action can be taken against a child below 7 years. Such a child can, however, be produced before the CWC if the circumstances warrant it.
A translator can be appointed by the Special Court to assist it in recording the testimony of a child. In such a situation, the translator is not a witness. However, if a translator has been used by the police to record the statement of the child, then she/he will be a witness. Summons can be issued to secure their appearance before the court.
Under Section 94(1), JJ Act, 2015, appearance of a person can be relied upon only to conclude that the person is a child. It cannot be the basis to conclude that the person was an adult. According to Section 94(2), JJ Act, 2015, the birth certificate from school, matriculation or evaluation certificates will be considered to determine if the person is a child. If these documents are not available, the birth certificate by a corporation, municipal authority, or a Panchayat will be considered. If these are also unavailable, the JJB or CWC can order an ossification test or latest medical age determination test. The Special Court under the POCSO
![]()
![]()
Act could also adhere to the procedure prescribed under the JJ Act, 2015 for age- determination as in Jarnail Singh v. State of Haryana,201 the Supreme Court has held that the procedure to determine age of a child in conflict with the law can be used to determine age of a child victim.
The crime is continuing as the offender was chasing the victim. Therefore, the Railway Police has duty to nab the offender and rescue the child and take all actions according to law, including FIR registration. Even if the offender was not chasing her, the rescue of the victim and post-rescue care as well as registration of a crime at the Railway PS is mandatory. After the FIR is registered, the SHO of the Railway PS can transfer the case to the PS having original jurisdiction and till such time they take over, all urgent steps required have to be undertaken. It is reiterated that want of jurisdiction is not sufficient cause to delay lodging of FIR and taking protective measures.
|
List of sexual offences and penalties under the POCSO Act |
|||
|
Offence |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Fine |
|
Penetrative Sexual Assault |
7 years |
Life imprisonment |
 |
|
Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault |
10 years (rigorous imprisonment |
Life imprisonment |
 |
|
Sexual Assault |
3 years |
5 years |
 |
|
Aggravated Sexual Assault |
5 years |
7 years |
 |
|
Sexual Harassment |
– |
3 years |
 |
|
Use of a child for pornographic purposes |
– |
5 years |
 |
Source: Raha, Giliyal, Sajjanashetty & Ramakrishnan, Frequently Asked Questions on the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, Centre for Child and the Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore, (revised 2nd ed 2016) pp. 31-32.
![]()
|
List of sexual offences and penalties under the IPC |
|||
|
Offence |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Fine |
|
Section 354: Assault or criminal force to a woman with intent to outrage her modesty |
– |
Two years |
And/ Or |
|
Section 354A(2): Sexual Harassment (physical contact and advance, sexual overtures, demand for sexual favours, showing pornography against will) |
– |
RI for 3 years |
And/ Or |
|
Section 354A(3): Sexual Harassment (making sexually coloured remarks) |
– |
1 year |
And/ Or |
|
Section 354B: Assault or use of criminal force to woman with intent to disrobe (abetment included) |
3 years |
7 years |
 |
|
Section 354C: Voyeurism (watching or capturing image of a woman engaging in a private act or disseminating such images) |
1st CV: 1yr 2nd CV: 3 years |
1st CV: 3 years 2nd CV: 7 years |
  |
|
Section 354D: Stalking (physical/electronic) |
– |
1st CV: 3 years 2nd CV: 5 years |
  |
|
Section 370(4): Trafficking of minor |
RI 10 years |
Life imprisonment |
 |
|
Section 370(5): Trafficking of more than one minor |
RI 14 years |
Life imprisonment |
 |
|
Section 370(6): Repeat trafficker of minors |
Imprisonment for remainder of natural life |
|
 |
|
Section 370A(1): Sexual exploitation of a trafficked manner |
RI for 5 years |
RI for 7 years |
 |
|
Section 376(1): Rape |
RI 7 years |
Life imprisonment |
 |
|
Section 376(2): Aggravated Rape (includes rape of a girl below 16 years of age) |
RI 10 years |
Life imprisonment for remainder of life |
 |
|
Section 376A: Rape causing death or resulting in vegetative state of victim |
RI 20 years |
Life imprisonment for remainder of life or death |
|
|
Section 376B:Sexual intercourse by husband upon his wife during separation |
2 years |
7 years |
 |
|
Section 376C: Sexual intercourse by a person in authority (includes superintendent or manager of children’s institutions) |
RI 5 years |
RI 10 years |
 |
|
Section 376D: Gang rape |
RI 20 years |
Life imprisonment for remainder of life |
 |
|
Section 376E: Repeat offenders under sections 376, 376A, 376D |
Imprisonment for remainder of life or death |
|
|
|
Section 377: Unnatural Offences |
Life imprisonment or imprisonment upto 10 years |
|
 |
|
Section 509: Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman |
– |
SI 3 years |
 |
|
List of sexual offences and penalties under the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 |
|||
|
Offence |
Minimum |
Maximum |
Fine |
|
Section 6(19): Failure to ensure child under care and custody of Children’s Home is not exposed to sexual offences, child trafficking or child prostitution. |
– |
3 years |
Upto Rs. 1 lakh |
|
Section 8(2): Punishment for sexual assault |
– |
3 years |
Upto Rs. 1 lakh |
|
Section 8(2): Punishment for grave sexual assault |
10 years |
Life imprisonment |
Rs. 2 lakhs |
|
Section 8(2): Punishment for incest |
10 years |
Life imprisonment |
Upto Rs. 2 lakhs |
|
Section 8(14): Punishment for failure of a developer of photographs or films to report discovery of sexual/ obscene depictions of children |
1 year |
3 years |
And/or Minimum of Rs. 50,000 |
|
Section 9(4): Exploitation of a child for commercial sexual exploitation |
|
7 years |
Upto Rs. 1 lakh |
|
Section 9(7): Abetment of performance of ceremony or act for dedicating minor girl child as devadasi |
|
3 years |
Upto Rs. 2000 |
|
Section 9(7) proviso: Abetment of above offence by parents |
2 years |
5 years |
Rs. 2000– Rs. 5000 |
State of Karnataka v. Shivanna (Supreme Court)202: In cases of rape, IO should take the victim immediately, as far as possible, to the nearest lady Metropolitan/ preferably lady Judicial Magistrate for recording the statement under Section 164, Cr.P.C. The IO should record the date and time at which he learn about the commission of rape and the date and time at which the victim was taken to the Magistrate. Reasons for delay exceeding 24 hours should be recorded in the case diary and a copy should be handed to the Magistrate along with a copy of the medical examination report.
Kum. Shraddha Meghshyam Velhal v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Application 354 of 201. Decided by the Bombay High Court on 03.07.14: In cases under the POCSO Act, police officers should produce the accused for remand before the Children’s Court and not before the Magistrates Court.
Prasad v. State of Kerala, (2013) 2 KLT 942: The POCSO Act does not prevent Magistrates from ordering first remand of an accused under the Act, since Section 167, Cr.P.C. allows it. However, subsequent remand orders or bail applications should be made only before the Special Court under the POCSO Act.
Santosh Kumar Mandal v.State, Bail Appln No. 1763/2016, Delhi High Court (28 September 2016): “Considering the gravity of the offences and the special mechanism provided under POCSO Act to hold that the offences are bailable though cognizable and would fall in category 3 would be rendering an interpretation to the classification provided in second part of First Schedule of Cr.P.C contrary to the object of the special enactment. Thus offences punishable under POCSO Act including Section 12 are cognizable and non-bailable offences.”
Note: The above interpretation is applicable only in the State of Bombay. In the absence of specifications of the nature of offences under the PCOSO Act, the Cr.P.C will apply.
Shimbhu v.State of Haryana, (2013) 10 SCALE 595: “Rape is a non- compoundable offence and it is an offence against the society and is not a matter to be left for the parties to compromise and settle.”
![]()
202 Available at https://indiankanoon.org/doc/2622362/
Lillu v. State of Haryana, AIR 2013 SC 1784:In this case, the Supreme Court held that the “two finger test and its interpretation violates the right of rape survivors to privacy, physical and mental integrity and dignity.”
State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh, (1996) 2 SCC 384: “Corroborative evidence is not an imperative component of judicial credence in every case of rape…It must not be over-looked that a woman or a girl subjected to sexual assault is not an accomplice to the crime but is a victim of another persons’ lust and it is improper and undesirable to test her evidence with a certain amount of suspicion, treating her as if she were an accomplice.”
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra, (1997) 5 SCC 341: “A child witness if found competent to depose to the facts and reliable one such evidence could be the basis of conviction. In witness can be considered under Section 118 of the Evidence Act provided that such witness is able to understand the questions and able to give rational answers thereof. The evidence of a child witness and credibility thereof would depend upon the circumstances of each case. The only precaution which the court should bear in mind while assessing the evidence of a child witness is that the witness must be a reliable one and his/her demeanour must be like any other competent witness and there is no likelihood of being tutored.”
Ranjit Hazarika v. State of Assam, (1998) 8 SCC 635: “The testimony of the victim in such cases is vital and unless there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the courts should find no difficulty to act on the testimony of a victim of sexual assault alone to convict an accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable. Seeking corroboration of her statement before relying upon the same, as a rule, in such cases amounts to adding insult to injury. Why should the evidence of a girl or a woman who complains of rape or sexual molestation be viewed with doubt, disbelief or suspicion? The court while appreciating the evidence of a prosecutrix may look for some assurance of her statement to satisfy its judicial conscience, since she is a witness who is interested in the outcome of the charge levelled by her, but there is no requirement of law to insist upon corroboration of her statement to base conviction of an accused.”
Balaji Sarjerao Kamble v. State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal No. 28 of 2016 decided by the Bombay High Court on 29.08.17.
Bearing in mind the age of the child victim who was about 6 to 8 years at the time of the alleged rape, the Bombay High Court held that “merely because date of the
incident is not stated by the victim, her evidence cannot be doubted. The [victim] is not expected to have such chronometric sense at the tender age.”
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Shree Kant Shekari, AIR 2004 SC 4404
Setting aside the acquittal in a case under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC on grounds of delay in lodging the FIR, the Supreme Court held: “Delay in lodging first information report cannot be used as a ritualistic formula for discarding prosecution case and doubting its authenticity. It only puts the court on guard to search for and consider if any explanation has been offered for the delay. Once it is offered, the court is to only see whether it is satisfactory or not. In a case if the prosecution fails to satisfactory explain the delay and there is possibility of embellishment or exaggeration in the prosecution version on account of such delay, it is a relevant factor. On the other hand, satisfactory explanation of the delay is weighty enough to reject the plea of false implication or vulnerability of prosecution case.”
In Rakesh Kumar v. State,203 the Delhi High Court laid down the following guidelines for test identification parade (TIP) where children below 12 years of age had to identify an accused:
![]()
203 Crl. A. 513/1998, decided on – 30.05.2014.
Vinay v. State of Karnataka, Criminal Petition No. 1105/2017 decided on 13.07.2017 by the Karnataka High Court.
The Karnataka High Court laid emphasis on the role of the Special Court in ensuring that the testimony of the child is recorded within 30 days from cognizance in this case. Additionally, it noted that the Investigating Officer should also adhere to this mandate. It held “if the Presiding Officer notices callous attitude on the part of the Investigating Officer in producing the properties, the same shall be brought on bench in the ‘crimes’ meeting held with the Police Officers of the District and the matter shall be brought to the notice of the superior Police officers. Even if the Investigating officer fails to produce the property on the date called for, that shall not stop the Court from recording the statement of the victim child …”
Sakshi v.Union of India, AIR 2004 SC 3566: Guidelines were issued by the Supreme Court to be followed during the trial of child sexual abuse or rape in this case. These guidelines are particularly significant for the on-going trials of rape cases before the enactment of the POCSO Act. The guidelines are:
Officer of the Court who may put them to the victim or witnesses in a language which is clear and is not embarrassing;
Virender v. State of NCT of Delhi, 2010 III AD (Delhi) 342
The Delhi High Court laid down guidelines to be followed by the police, Magistrate, and court in sexual offences against children based on decisions of the Supreme Court and the High Court. The guidelines relevant to the police and not expressly mentioned in the POCSO Act are as follows:
v. State of N.C.T. Of Delhi and Ors.)
Other general guidelines laid down in this case were:
It must be ensured that the number of times that a child victim or witness is required to recount the occurrence is minimised to the absolutely essential. For this purpose, right at the inception, a multidisciplinary team involving the investigating officer and the police; social services resource personnel as well as the prosecutor should be created and utilised in the investigation and prosecution of such cases involving a child either as a victim or a witness. This would create and inspire a feeling of confidence and trust in the child.
|
Jhakhu Case The multi-disciplinary team of CBI that investigated the Jhakhu case204 (which led to Sakshi Vs UOI) had the following: The investigating Officer (a lady officer); The supervisory officer (a male); The counsellor from NGO (a lady) who facilitated the ice breaking of the victim with the investigators; The prosecutor (male); The forensic expert (male); The psycho social expert ( a Lady). The interview was done at a pace the child was comfortable, and was a child friendly ambience; There were no intimidatory questions; the child victim was facilitated to speak out and she spoke in the language of the child, which was recorded verbatim, which the Court eventually appreciated too. It may not be possible to have such an expert team elsewhere’ but all those who have some expertise and need to be involved in the interviewing process, may be brought together and in a non-intimidating ambience so that the victim can be facilitated to speak. |
Chander Singh v. State, Crl. A. 751/2014 decided by the Delhi High Court on 03.06.2016
In this case, a 12-year-old deaf girl had been sexually assaulted by the accused. Her statement had been recorded through gestures and drawings, which were interpreted with the assistance of a teacher working in a primary school for deaf children run by the Delhi Government. The defence argued that her testimony could not be read as evidence because she could not be cross-examined. The Delhi High Court held, “A party cross-examining a deaf and dumb witness like any other witness is required to act within the bounds of law and cannot be permitted to cross-examine the witness all and sundry on irrelevant questions.” It further held that, “When a deaf and dumb witness is under cross-examination, the Court is required to take due care of the fact that vocabulary of such a person is limited as he or she speaks through sign language and it may not be possible for
![]()
204 Smt Sudesh Jhaku v. K.C.J, https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1525708/
that witness to answer, or in detail explain every answer by sign language. This disability of a limited vocabulary of sign language does not affect either the competence or the credibility of such witness. The Court is required to exercise control over the cross-examination keeping in view the ability of the witness to answer the questions.” The Delhi High Court concluded that the drawing of the victim in response to the cross-examination was sufficient compliance of the right to cross-examination of the accused and upheld the appellant’s conviction.
Child trafficking – within countries, and across national borders – is closely interlinked with the demand for cheap labour in sectors and among employers where the working conditions and the treatment grossly violates the rights of the children. These forms range from bonded or forced labour, child domestic labour, commercial sexual exploitation and prostitution, drug couriering, and child soldiering to exploitative or slavery-like practices in the informal industrial sector.
According to Crime in India, 2016, 2992 cases of child trafficking (under Sections 370/370A, 366-B, 366-A of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 (ITPA) were reported in 2015, a drop from 3490 cases in 2015.205 9034 children were reportedly victims of trafficking in 2016 constituting 58.74% of all trafficked victims206 14183 children were rescued from trafficking of which boys constituted approximately 61%.207 Of the total, cases under the ITPA constituted only 1.66%, cases under Sections 370 and 370A comprised 6%, while 89% of the cases were lodged for procuration of minor girls under Section 366-A, IPC.208 The conviction rate for cases of child trafficking stood at 14.3% in 2015, while the pendency rate was 92%.209
These figures are however only a fraction of the children who are missing or go missing in India, and many cases go unreported.
Children are trafficked for various purposes – commercial sexual exploitation (prostitution, child pornography, child sex-tourism, online commercial sexual exploitation), labour, transplantation of human organs, child marriage, illicit adoptions, and begging.
![]()
206 Table 4A.2(i) and (ii), IPC and SLL Crimes Against Children-2016 in Crime in India, 2016; Table 6A.7, Cases Reported & Rate of Crime Relating to Child Trafficking During 2015, http:// ncrb.nic.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2015/FILES/Table%206A.7.pdf
206 Table 14.2 Victims Trafficked, Crime in India, 2016.
207 Table 14.3 Victim Rescued, Crime in India, 2016.
208 TABLE 6A.8 Incidence (I), Victims and Rate (R) of Total Crimes Relating to Child Trafficking During 2015, http://ncrb.nic.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2015/FILES/Table%206A.8.pdf
209 Table 6A.10, Disposal of Cases by Courts for Crimes Relating to Child Trafficking during 2015, http://ncrb.nic.in/StatPublications/CII/CII2015/FILES/Table%206A.10.pdf
This Chapter addresses only trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation of children. Trafficking for labour is explained in the chapter pertaining to child labour.
A Delhi High Court judgment210 highlighted that of the 44,000 children that are reported missing annually, only 11,000 get traced. The NHRC Action Research (2002-04) had brought out evidence to show linkages – that many missing children, though reported as missing, had indeed been trafficked. Taking into consideration these issues, the Supreme Court directed in 2013211 that all missing cases be registered as FIR with a presumption that a missing child has been trafficked/ abducted. If the child is not traced in four months, the investigation should be handed over to the Anti Human Trafficking Unit (AHTU). The order further directed that the AHTU should report progress of such cases to the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA).
|
Protocol for the Police in case of a missing child212 A missing child refers to a child whose whereabouts are not known to the parents, legal guardian or any other person/institution which is legally entrusted with the custody of the child. Irrespective of the circumstances in which the child has disappeared, the child should be considered a ‘missing child’ and a ‘child in need of care and protection’ until the location, safety and well-being of the child has been established.213 Dos and Don’ts for the Police
|
![]()
210 Bachpan Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India, Writ Petition (C) No. 51 of 2006, decided on 18.04.2011
211 Bachpan Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India,Writ Petition (Civil) no. 75 of 2012, decided on 10.05.2013
212 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 92.
213 JJ Model Rules, 2016, Rule 92(1).
The Ministry of Women and Child Development has prepared a comprehensive Standard Operating Procedure in cases of Missing Children214 which must be referred by police officers in such cases. |
![]()
214 Standard Operating Procedure forCasesof Missing Children, Ministry for Women and Child Development, available at http://www.wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/FINAL%20E- office%20SOP.pdf
Article 23(1) of the Indian Constitution prohibits traffic in human beings, beggar, and other similar forms of forced labour and states that contravention of this fundamental right against exploitation is a punishable offence. Additionally, the following legislations are relevant to child trafficking:
Besides, legislations such as the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006; Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act, 1986; and Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 will also apply to cases involving trafficking for marriage, labour, or sale of organs, respectively. The provisions of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended in 2015 may also be relevant.
There are also the state legislations dealing with devdasi , which is another façade for trafficking girls/ women for prostitution – such as, The Bombay Devdasi (Protection) Act, 1934; The Madras Devdasi(Prevention of Dedication) Act, 1947; The Andhra Pradesh (Prohibition of Dedication) Act, 1988; The Karnataka Devdasi (Prohibition of Dedication) Act, 1982; and the Goa Children’s Act, 2003.
![]()
215 IPC, Section 370(1), Explanation 2.
|
Relevant Provision |
Activities |
Means/Methods |
Purpose/Intention |
|
Section 370, IPC (amended in 2013) – Trafficking of persons |
Recruitment, transportation, harbouring, transferring or receiving person/ persons |
Threats, force or any other form of coercion, abduction, practicing fraud or deception, abuse of power, inducement including giving or receiving payments or benefits to achieve consent of person having control over the person |
Exploitation – including physical exploitation, any form of sexual exploitation, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or forced removal of organs. |
|
Section 16, Explanation III, POCSO Act, 2012 – Abetment of an offence Note: The term “trafficking” is not used in the POCSO Act. |
Employment, harbouring, receiving or transportation of a child |
Threat, use of force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or position of vulnerability, giving or receiving of payments of benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person |
Commission of sexual offences under POCSO Act |
|
Section 5A, ITPA – Procuring, inducing or taking person for the sake of prostitution |
Recruitment, transportation, harbouring, transferring or receiving a person/persons |
This provision of the ITPA does not explicitly provide any means; however, activities under this Section could be deemed to include the following: Threats, force, coercion, abduction, fraud or deception, abuse of power or position of vulnerability, giving or receiving payments or benefits to achieve consent of person having control over another person |
Commercial sexual exploitation |
|
Section 2(z), Goa Children’s Act, 2003 – “child trafficking” |
Procurement, recruitment, transportation, transfer,harbouring or receipt of children |
Threat, force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or position of vulnerability, giving or receiving payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control overanother person |
Monetary gain or otherwise |
Any person who is affected by, or subjected to, any act in the trafficking process is a victim. This includes the following: -
Trafficking is an organized crime. The list of offenders in a trafficking crime include one or more of the following216:
![]()
216 P.M. Nair, "Handbook for Law Enforcement Agencies on Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation", UNODC, 2007.
The list is only illustrative and not exhaustive; and the onus is on the Investigating Officer (IO) to fathom the entire process of trafficking and identify who else is involved.
Human trafficking is an organized crime. It is a crime with several components and therefore has been referred to as a ‘basket of crimes’.217 From the victim’s perspective, a typical case of human trafficking for sexual exploitation may have the following components: -
![]()
217 Nair PM, Human Trafficking: Dimension, Challenges & Responses, Konark Publishers, 2010.
This list is only illustrative and not exhaustive. It must be noted that not all elements may be present, but the act may still amount to trafficking. For instance, in case of children belonging to devadasi families, the child may not be displaced, yet other elements may be present.
The crime can be gauged only with reference to the context, and therefore alertness in observation is the key aspect in detection. The indicators will vary from context to context. However, some of the generic indicators are as follows: -
Sex trafficking and labour trafficking can be intertwined, for example, a woman trafficked for domestic labour can be a victim of sex slavery also. Trafficking differs from ‘smuggling of migrants’ as in the case of latter there is an element of consent from the victim. However, the investigating officers should be circumspect in ascertaining consent because if the consent has been obtained by lure, deception, coercion or force, it is not an informed consent and therefore, even such persons are also victims of trafficking. The trafficking process essentially has a chain starting from source, transit and then to destination. It is a continuing crime, and may entail moving from one destination to another or the exploitation by several persons continuing over a period of time.
The cause of trafficking can be classified into two: -
The NHRC research218 had brought out that the vulnerability factors are essentially ignorance of rights, illiteracy, lack of care of children in family and community, gender discrimination, discrimination on the basis of caste, community, disability, sexual orientation etc., economic disparity, lack of law enforcement, lack of priority among respondents and nexus, lack of political will and/or nexus, etc. Recent empirical research revealed that economic conditions, lack of family support, and force were key causes, among others that pushed women into prostitution.219 The demand factors, which constitute the major causes of human trafficking is essentially violence of human beings against others. This violence can be manifested into different acts that constitute brutality. Sex slavery is an aggravated form of violence. The abuser/exploiter indulges in several types of violence on the victim causing different types and intensity of harm including physical, emotional, mental, financial, health hazards, etc.
The word ‘customer’ does not appear in the ITPA. With respect to sexual exploitation of children, the ‘customers/ clients’ can be charged directly under POCSO also.
Trafficking can be within the country or trans-border also. It can even take place under one roof. It is essentially a crime, which makes huge profits with lower risks.
|
Section 2(aa), ITPA |
“child” means a person who has not completed 16 years |
|
Section 2(cb), ITPA |
“minor” means a person who has completed 16 years but not 18 years. |
|
Section 2(d), Goa Children’s Act, 2003 |
“child” means any person who has not completed 18 years of age; in an offence of rape, “child” means any person who has not completed 16 years of age. |
|
Section 2(d), POCSO Act |
“child” means any person below 18 years |
|
Section 2(12), JJ Act, 2015 |
“child” means a person who has not completed 18 years. |
![]()
218 Nair, P.M & Sen. S, Trafficking in Women and Children in India, Orient Longman, 2005
219 Wilson, B & Nochajski, T.H., "On the Continuum of Exit: Understanding the Stages of Change Among Women in Commercial Sexual Exploitation", Gender Issues, September 2017, https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/319720514_On_the_Continuum_of_Exit_Understanding_ the_Stages_of_Change_Among_Women_in_Commercial_Sexual_Exploitation
The term “child” or “minor” is not defined under the IPC and does not appear in the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976.
Any child found vulnerable or likely to be inducted into trafficking is a child in need of care and protection (CINCP) under Section 2(14)(ix) of the JJ Act, 2015. Such a child can be produced before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) by any police officer or Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU) or officer of the District Child Protection Unit (DCPU), labour inspector, Childline, public servant, probation officer, Child Welfare Officer, social worker, public spirited citizen, nurse, doctor, or management of a hospital or nursing home, or by the child herself/ himself.220 Rehabilitation and restoration/repatriation of a trafficked child will have to be in accordance with the JJ Act, 2015.
Under the IPC, the following provisions would apply to a case of trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation of a person below 18 years:
– Section 3
![]()
220 JJ Act, 2015, Section 31(1).
While the POCSO Act, 2012 does not expressly use the term “trafficking”, according to Explanation III to Section 16, employing, harbouring, receiving or transporting a child, by means of threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or of a position, vulnerability or giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of any sexual offence under the Act would constitute aiding the offence and amount to abetment.
The following offences will be relevant to trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation under the JJ Act, 2015:
Under the Goa Children’s Act, 2003, exploitation of child for commercial sexual exploitation is an offence under Section 9(4).
Under the ITPA, the ‘doctrine of presumption’ is a good weapon for preventing and combating trafficking by virtue of the fact that the specific provisions of presumption casts onus of proof on the accused. The relevant provisions are221:
![]()
221 P.M. Nair, "Handbook for Law Enforcement Agencies on Trafficking for Sexual Exploitation", UNODC, 2007.
|
Act |
Investigation |
Departments |
Adjudication |
Care & Protection, Rehabilitation |
|
IPC |
Police and special units like AHTU |
Home |
Sessions Court |
CWC |